activity
20232026
collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

From Concept Alignment to Causal Grounding: An Intervention Test of Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness

Qianli Wang, Yilong Wang, Dennis Wei +5

Chain-of-thought (CoT) can sound plausible yet be unfaithful to the model's underlying reasoning. Most prior work probes CoT faithfulness through input--output behavior or input at…

cs.CL2026

Limitations of Automated Simulatability: LLM Simulators Can Bypass Explanations

Antonin Poché, Fanny Jourdan, Nils Feldhus +6

Simulatability is an evaluation protocol for explanations that quantifies their usefulness by how well they help a user predict a task model's outputs. Since human evaluation is co…

cs.CL2026

Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization

Jingyi Sun, Qianli Wang, Pepa Atanasova +2

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) faithfulness, i.e., whether CoTs genuinely reflect large language models' (LLM) underlying behavior, is typically evaluated with metrics under two disjoint p…

cs.CL2026

Judge Circuits Explain Format-Induced Inconsistency in LLM-as-a-Judge

Nils Feldhus, Tanja Baeumel, Elena Golimblevskaia +10

LLM-as-a-judge has become the dominant paradigm for grading model outputs at scale, yet the same model assigns systematically different scores when its output format changes (e.g.,…

cs.CL2026

Macro: Enhancing Multilingual Counterfactual Explanations through Alignment-as-Preference Optimization

Yilong Wang, Qianli Wang, Bohao Chu +3

Self-generated counterfactual explanations (SCEs) are minimally modified inputs (minimality) generated by large language models (LLMs) that flip their own predictions (validity), o…

cs.CL2026

eTracer: Polarity-Aware Evidence Grounding

Bohao Chu, Qianli Wang, Hendrik Damm +8

Evidence grounding makes generated content verifiable by linking statements to their sources. However, effective verifiability requires two properties that existing methods fail to…

cs.CL2026

Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models

Hengyuan Zhang, Zhihao Zhang, Mingyang Wang +26

Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) has emerged as a vital approach to demystify the opaque decision-making of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing reviews primarily treat…

cs.CL2026

What Are We Measuring in NLG? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Trends 2020-2025

Jing Yang, Nils Feldhus, Salar Mohtaj +10

As Natural Language Generation (NLG) dominates modern NLP, scalable evaluation remains a critical bottleneck. Consequently, LLM-as-a-judge (LaaJ) adoption has accelerated rapidly,…

cs.CL2026

iFlip: Iterative Feedback-driven Counterfactual Example Refinement

Yilong Wang, Qianli Wang, Nils Feldhus

Counterfactual examples are minimal edits to an input that alter a model's prediction. They are widely employed in explainable AI to probe model behavior and in natural language pr…

cs.CL2026

Can Large Language Models Still Explain Themselves? Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Self-Explanations

Qianli Wang, Nils Feldhus, Pepa Atanasova +4

Quantization is widely used to accelerate inference and streamline the deployment of large language models (LLMs), yet its effects on self-explanations (SEs) remain unexplored. SEs…

cs.CL2026

Parallel Universes, Parallel Languages: A Comprehensive Study on LLM-based Multilingual Counterfactual Example Generation

Qianli Wang, Van Bach Nguyen, Yihong Liu +6

Counterfactuals refer to minimally edited inputs that cause a model's prediction to change, serving as a promising approach to explaining the model's behavior. Large language model…