activity
20232026
most citedConway and Doyle Can Divide by Three, But I Can't

1 citations · 1 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

math.LO2026

A Borel graphable equivalence relation with no Borel graphing of diameter two

Patrick Lutz

We answer a question of Arant, Kechris and Lutz by showing that there is a Borel graphable equivalence relation with no Borel graphing of diameter less than 3. More specifically, w…

cs.LG2025

Linear Transformers Implicitly Discover Unified Numerical Algorithms

Patrick Lutz, Aditya Gangrade, Hadi Daneshmand +1

We train a linear attention transformer on millions of masked-block matrix completion tasks: each prompt is masked low-rank matrix whose missing block may be (i) a scalar predictio…

math.LO2025

Ranking theories via encoded -models

Hanul Jeon, Patrick Lutz, Fedor Pakhomov +1

Ranking theories according to their strength is a recurring motif in mathematical logic. We introduce a new ranking of arbitrary (not necessarily recursively axiomatized) theories…

math.LO2023★ 1 cited

Conway and Doyle Can Divide by Three, But I Can't

Patrick Lutz

Conway and Doyle have claimed to be able to divide by three. We attempt to replicate their achievement and fail. In the process, we get tangled up in some shoes and socks and forge…

math.LO2023

A theory satisfying a strong version of Tennenbaum's theorem

Patrick Lutz, James Walsh

We answer a question of Pakhomov by showing that there is a consistent, c.e. theory such that no theory which is definitionally equivalent to has a computable model. A key…

math.LO2023

Martin's conjecture for regressive functions on the hyperarithmetic degrees

Patrick Lutz

We answer a question of Slaman and Steel by showing that a version of Martin's conjecture holds for all regressive functions on the hyperarithmetic degrees. A key step in our proof…