most citedTutorBench: A Benchmark To Assess Tutoring Capabilities Of Large Language Models

1 citations · 1 across the 15 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent Deployment

Veronica Chatrath, Bryan Zhu, Jingxuan Fan +15

An AI agent can perform well on benchmarks and still be unsuitable for deployment. Existing AI-agent benchmarks measure whether an agent can complete realistic professional work, w…

cs.AI2026

Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures

Harsh Raj, Vipul Gupta, Anas Mahmoud +4

Existing evaluations often reduce agent failures to system-level outcomes, obscuring where the fault originated and which intervention would improve the agent system. This creates…

cs.AI2026

CRAFT: Clustering Rubrics to Diagnose Weak LLM Capabilities and Generate Targeted Fine-Tuning Data

Vipul Gupta, Zihao Wang, Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru +3

Evaluations should do more than measure a models current performance. They should tell us what to fix for the next model iteration and provide a way to generate targeted post train…

cs.AI2026

Not Every Rubric Teaches Equally: Policy-Aware Rubric Rewards for RLVR

Utkarsh Tyagi, Xingang Guo, MohammadHossein Rezaei +5

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has made post-training highly effective when correctness can be checked automatically. However, many important model behaviors requir…

cs.AI2026

Reward Hacking in Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning

Anas Mahmoud, MohammadHossein Rezaei, Zihao Wang +3

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has enabled strong post-training gains in domains such as math and coding, though many open-ended settings rely on rubric-based rewar…