1 citations · 1 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for
7 papers · 1 filter
CoRA: Confidence-Rationale Alignment for Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Juming Xiong, Weixin Liu, Kevin Guo +9
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning can improve LLM performance, but high answer confidence may be misleading when the accompanying CoT rationale is plausible yet incomplete or poorly…
It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty
Kevin H. Guo, Chao Yan, Avinash Baidya +5
Large language models (LLMs) are known to abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback. While prior research largely attributes this behavior to sycophancy learned duri…
CLEAR: Revealing How Noise and Ambiguity Degrade Reliability in LLMs for Medicine
Kevin H. Guo, Chao Yan, Avinash Baidya +5
Medical large language model (LLM) evaluations rely on simplified, exam-style benchmarks that rarely reflect the ambiguity of real-world medical inquiries. We introduce the CLinica…
Stop Listening to Me! How Multi-turn Conversations Can Degrade LLM Reliability
Kevin H. Guo, Chao Yan, Avinash Baidya +5
Large language models (LLMs) excel on static benchmarks, but their performance across multi-turn conversations, which better reflect real-world usage, remains understudied. Address…
Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Selective Sampling for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Juming Xiong, Kevin Guo, Congning Ni +7
Large language models (LLMs) can achieve strong reasoning performance through chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, yet they often generate unnecessarily long reasoning paths that incu…
NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents
Jingzhe Ding, Shengda Long, Changxin Pu +46
Recent advances in coding agents suggest rapid progress toward autonomous software development, yet existing benchmarks fail to rigorously evaluate the long-horizon capabilities re…