collaborators

13 papers

cs.CL2026

IdeaScientist: Orchestrating Agents for Grounded Scientific Ideation

Jiarui Liu, Renjie Tao, Yiwei Liao +15

Despite rapid progress in automating scientific research, generating promising and well grounded research solutions remains a central challenge. We isolate research ideation as a s…

cs.CL2026

On the Behavioral Traits of LLM Agents

Haokai Zhao, Jie Gao, Yunze Xiao +5

Users increasingly describe different AI agents as distinct colleagues to work with. AI personality research aims to quantify such impressions by attributing human- like "traits" t…

cs.AI2026

Harbor Adapters and Harbor-Index: Infrastructure and a Curated Meta-Dataset for Large-Scale Agentic Evaluation

Lin Shi, Haowei Lin, Zixuan Zhu +123

Evaluating agents on the growing number of agentic benchmarks is challenging because they often require complex environments and agent integrations. We introduce Harbor Adapters, a…

cs.CL2026

Group Alignment-Induced Sycophancy: A Two-Sided Evaluation of Steerable Pluralistic Alignment

Haokai Zhao, Yunze Xiao, Weihao Xuan +3

Group alignment adapts a language model to a demographic group to produce responses that reflect the group's opinions, values, and preferences. Sycophancy, a well-documented by-pro…

cs.HC2026

ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media

Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Yunze Xiao, Lionel Z. Wang +2

LLM-based AI companion agents are increasingly being perceived not only as tools but also as social companions. On social media, people recount conversations where these agents com…

cs.CL2026

MixSD: Mixed Contextual Self-Distillation for Knowledge Injection

Jiarui Liu, Lechen Zhang, Yongjin Yang +5

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely used to inject new knowledge into language models, but it often degrades pretrained capabilities such as reasoning and general-domain perform…

cs.AI2026

Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark

Sheng Jin, Minghao Liu, Yunze Xiao +24

Knowledge benchmarks for LLMs face three issues: scaling-driven designs that do not operationalize disciplinary representativeness; flat-payment annotation that permits lazy consen…

cs.CL2026

Is LLM's Moral Decision Compositional?

Weijia Zhang, Ruiqi Chen, Yunze Xiao +1

Moral evaluations of language models typically infer a model's values from its choices between single acts, yet in everyday life a person is judged on their history of good and bad…

cs.CL2026

The Chameleon's Limit: Investigating Persona Collapse and Homogenization in Large Language Models

Yunze Xiao, Vivienne J. Zhang, Chenghao Yang +3

Large language models (LLMs) have powered multi-agent simulations such as survey respondents or application users. However, LLMs lack the population-level diversity required by the…

cs.CR2026

Say Something Else: Rethinking Contextual Privacy as Information Sufficiency

Yunze Xiao, Wenkai Li, Xiaoyuan Wu +3

LLM agents increasingly draft messages on behalf of users, yet users routinely overshare sensitive information and disagree on what counts as private. Existing systems support only…

cs.CL2026

Towards Valid Student Simulation with Large Language Models

Zhihao Yuan, Yunze Xiao, Ming Li +4

This paper presents a conceptual and methodological framework for large language model (LLM) based student simulation in educational settings. The authors identify a core failure m…

cs.AI2026

Sentipolis: Emotion-Aware Agents for Social Simulations

Chiyuan Fu, Lyuhao Chen, Yunze Xiao +3

LLM agents are increasingly used for social simulation, yet emotion is often treated as a transient cue, causing emotional amnesia and weak long-horizon continuity. We present Sent…

cs.CV2025

Taming Object Hallucinations with Verified Atomic Confidence Estimation

Jiarui Liu, Weihao Xuan, Zhijing Jin +1

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, particularly errors in object existence, attributes, or relations, which undermine their reliability. We…