activity
20232026
most citedRewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

3 citations · 10 across the 15 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.GT2026

Decentralized LLM Workflows via Sequential Auctions

Ian Gemp, Shubhendu Trivedi, Adam Fisch +7

We present a scalable framework for solving multi-step tasks through a decentralized market of self-interested agents. Prior theoretical work demonstrated that agents organized thr…

cs.LG2026

Your Transformer Is Secretly Elastic

Walter Simoncini, Dheeraj Varghese, Gertjan J. Burghouts +1

Scaling up transformers has produced models with broad capabilities, deployed across heterogeneous hardware and fluctuating workloads. Yet, model families offer only a few fixed si…

cs.AI2026

Pandora's AI Model Routing Box: Efficient Allocation with Costly Value Estimation

Adam Fisch, Shubhendu Trivedi, Fantine Huot +5

Heterogeneous AI systems composed of multiple models, architectures, harnesses, or inference-time settings can improve quality and efficiency by routing queries to the specialist w…

cs.LG2026

CollabEval: Statistically Efficient Collaborative Model Evaluation via Matrix Completion

Adam Fisch, Daniel Deutsch, Joshua Maynez +5

Evaluating generative AI models is a routine, but resource-intensive, process that is conducted over and over again during the course of model development. In this work, we propose…

cs.CL2026

Robust LLM Performance Certification via Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Minghe Shen, Ananth Balashankar, Adam Fisch +2

The ability to rigorously estimate the failure rates of large language models (LLMs) is a prerequisite for their safe deployment. Currently, however, practitioners often face a tra…

cs.AI2026

Rich Insights from Cheap Signals: Efficient Evaluations via Tensor Factorization

Felipe Maia Polo, Aida Nematzadeh, Virginia Aglietti +2

Moving beyond evaluations that collapse performance across heterogeneous prompts toward fine-grained evaluation at the prompt level, or within relatively homogeneous subsets, is ne…

cs.CL2026

MT-PingEval: Evaluating Multi-Turn Collaboration with Private Information Games

Jacob Eisenstein, Fantine Huot, Adam Fisch +2

We present a scalable and verifiable methodology for evaluating language models in multi-turn interactions, using a suite of collaborative games that require effective communicatio…

cs.LG2026

Learning Steerable Clarification Policies with Collaborative Self-play

Jonathan Berant, Maximillian Chen, Adam Fisch +4

To handle underspecified or ambiguous queries, AI assistants need a policy for managing their uncertainty to determine (a) when to guess the user intent and answer directly, (b) wh…

cs.LG2025

Plantain: Plan-Answer Interleaved Reasoning

Anthony Liang, Jonathan Berant, Adam Fisch +3

Reasoning models often spend a significant amount of time thinking before they generate a visible response. In the meantime, they do not give the user any hints as to whether their…

cs.CL2025

Mixture-of-Recursions: Learning Dynamic Recursive Depths for Adaptive Token-Level Computation

Sangmin Bae, Yujin Kim, Reza Bayat +8

Scaling language models unlocks impressive capabilities, but the accompanying computational and memory demands make both training and deployment expensive. Existing efficiency effo…

cs.LG2025

Cost-Optimal Active AI Model Evaluation

Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Jacob Eisenstein, Jonathan Berant +2

The development lifecycle of generative AI systems requires continual evaluation, data acquisition, and annotation, which is costly in both resources and time. In practice, rapid i…

cs.LG2025

Mitigating Preference Hacking in Policy Optimization with Pessimism

Dhawal Gupta, Adam Fisch, Christoph Dann +1

This work tackles the problem of overoptimization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), a prevalent technique for aligning models with human preferences. RLHF relie…

cs.LG2025

Don't lie to your friends: Learning what you know from collaborative self-play

Jacob Eisenstein, Reza Aghajani, Adam Fisch +5

To be helpful assistants, AI agents must be aware of their own capabilities and limitations. This includes knowing when to answer from parametric knowledge versus using tools, when…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

Amrith Setlur, Chirag Nagpal, Adam Fisch +6

A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs). PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, po…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Rel-A.I.: An Interaction-Centered Approach To Measuring Human-LM Reliance

Kaitlyn Zhou, Jena D. Hwang, Xiang Ren +3

The ability to communicate uncertainty, risk, and limitation is crucial for the safety of large language models. However, current evaluations of these abilities rely on simple cali…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation

Adam Fisch, Jacob Eisenstein, Vicky Zayats +5

Language model (LM) post-training (or alignment) involves maximizing a reward function that is derived from preference annotations. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a popula…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking

Jacob Eisenstein, Chirag Nagpal, Alekh Agarwal +9

Reward models play a key role in aligning language model applications towards human preferences. However, this setup creates an incentive for the language model to exploit errors i…