activity
20242026
most citedGLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

4 citations · 4 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cs.CL2026

Learning Ordinal Probabilistic Reward from Preferences

Longze Chen, Lu Wang, Qi Deng +7

Reward models are crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values and intentions. Existing approaches follow either Generative (GRMs) or Discriminative (DRMs) p…

cs.SE2026

Computer-Using World Model

Yiming Guan, Rui Yu, John Zhang +15

Agents operating in complex software environments benefit from reasoning about the consequences of their actions, as even a single incorrect user interface (UI) operation can derai…

cs.CR2026

Mitigating the Safety-utility Trade-off in LLM Alignment via Adaptive Safe Context Learning

Yanbo Wang, Minzheng Wang, Jian Liang +3

While reasoning models have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks, their increasing power necessitates stringent safety measures. For safety alignment, the core ch…

cs.CL2026

Skill-Aware Data Selection and Fine-Tuning for Data-Efficient Reasoning Distillation

Lechen Zhang, Yunxiang Zhang, Wei Hu +1

Large reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 and their distilled variants achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks. Yet, distilling these models often demands large-scal…

cs.CL2025★ 4 cited

GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

5 Team, Aohan Zeng, Xin Lv +167

We present GLM-4.5, an open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language model with 355B total parameters and 32B activated parameters, featuring a hybrid reasoning method that s…

cs.AI2025

FEVO: Financial Knowledge Expansion and Reasoning Evolution for Large Language Models

Bo Pang, Yalu Ouyang, Hangfei Xu +6

Advancements in reasoning for large language models (LLMs) have lead to significant performance improvements for LLMs in various fields such as mathematics and programming. However…

cs.CL2025

Do Language Models Think Consistently? A Study of Value Preferences Across Varying Response Lengths

Inderjeet Nair, Lu Wang

Evaluations of LLMs' ethical risks and value inclinations often rely on short-form surveys and psychometric tests, yet real-world use involves long-form, open-ended responses -- le…

cs.CL2024

MIDGARD: Self-Consistency Using Minimum Description Length for Structured Commonsense Reasoning

Inderjeet Nair, Lu Wang

We study the task of conducting structured reasoning as generating a reasoning graph from natural language input using large language models (LLMs). Previous approaches have explor…