most citedPaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&A

3 citations · 7 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.HCShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.HC2026★ 1 cited

An Expert Schema for Evaluating Large Language Model Errors in Scholarly Question-Answering Systems

Anna Martin-Boyle, William Humphreys, Martha Brown +2

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming scholarly tasks like search and summarization, but their reliability remains uncertain. Current evaluation metrics for testing LLM rel…

cs.HC2026★ 3 cited

PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&A

Anna Martin-Boyle, Cara A. C. Leckey, Martha C. Brown +1

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in scholarly question-answering (QA) systems to help researchers synthesize vast amounts of literature. However, these systems of…

cs.HC2026★ 1 cited

Unraveling Entangled Feeds: Rethinking Social Media Design to Enhance User Well-being

Ashlee Milton, Dan Runningen, Loren Terveen +2

Social media platforms have rapidly adopted algorithmic curation with little consideration for the potential harm to users' mental well-being. We present findings from design works…

cs.HC2026

Opportunities and Barriers for AI Feedback on Meeting Inclusion in Socioorganizational Teams

Mo Houtti, Moyan Zhou, Daniel Runningen +5

Inclusion is important for meeting effectiveness, which is in turn central to organizational functioning. One way of improving inclusion in meetings is through feedback, but social…

cs.HC2025★ 2 cited

Wisdom of the Crowd, Without the Crowd: A Socratic LLM for Asynchronous Deliberation on Perspectivist Data

Malik Khadar, Daniel Runningen, Julia Tang +2

Data annotation underpins the success of modern AI, but the aggregation of crowd-collected datasets can harm the preservation of diverse perspectives in data. Difficult and ambiguo…