4 citations · 7 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers
OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment
Ming Zhang, Kexin Tan, Yueyuan Huang +20
Evaluating novelty is critical yet challenging in peer review, as reviewers must assess submissions against a vast, rapidly evolving literature. This report presents OpenNovelty, a…
TaxoBench: Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies
Ming Zhang, Jiabao Zhuang, Wenqing Jing +19
Deep Research Agents increasingly automate survey writing, yet existing benchmarks do not jointly test whether they retrieve the papers experts consider essential and organize thos…
LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models
Ming Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng +19
Existing evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting, critical issues that obscure true model ca…
From GPT-4 to Gemini and Beyond: Assessing the Landscape of MLLMs on Generalizability, Trustworthiness and Causality through Four Modalities
Chaochao Lu, Chen Qian, Guodong Zheng +33
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive abilities in generating reasonable responses with respect to multi-modal contents. However, there is still a wide ga…