4 citations · 4 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment
Guoqiang Zhang, Kexin Tan, Ming Zhang +12
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in peer review at major AI conferences, yet novelty remains a persistent weak point. Existing benchmarks assess novelty as a sing…
AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier
Jiazheng Zhang, Ziche Fu, Zhiheng Xi +13
Verifiers have been demonstrated to enhance LLM reasoning via test-time scaling (TTS). Yet, they face significant challenges in complex domains. Error propagation from incorrect in…
OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment
Ming Zhang, Kexin Tan, Yueyuan Huang +20
Evaluating novelty is critical yet challenging in peer review, as reviewers must assess submissions against a vast, rapidly evolving literature. This report presents OpenNovelty, a…
TaxoBench: Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies
Ming Zhang, Jiabao Zhuang, Wenqing Jing +19
Deep Research Agents increasingly automate survey writing, yet existing benchmarks do not jointly test whether they retrieve the papers experts consider essential and organize thos…
Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment
Jiazheng Zhang, Wenqing Jing, Zizhuo Zhang +12
Reward models (RMs) are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values, yet noisy preference feedback can induce reward misgeneralization through spurious corre…