most citedInstitutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety

2 citations · 2 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.CL2026

Xeno-Interpretability: Investigating the Alien Minds of LLMs

F. Pierucci, M. Bracale Syrnikov, M. Prandi +3

Large language models are usually interpreted through concepts that humans already possess: truthfulness, refusal, deception, personality, harmfulness, and related categories. This…

cs.MA2026

Draining the Energy Commons: Self-Defeating Over-Appropriation as a Coordination Failure in Agentic LLM Collectives

Marcantonio Bracale Syrnikov, Federico Pierucci, Matteo Prandi +4

LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents that plan, use tools, and act over time. When they share persistent resources, such as compute pools or energy reserves, decisions by one a…

cs.CY2026

Learning from Mistakes: Can LLM Self-Recover after Misalignment?

Olga E. Sorokoletova, Francesco Giarrusso, Vincenzo Suriani +1

Responsible AI initiatives place great emphasis on the safety of Large Language Model (LLM)-based systems. In particular, it has become standard practice to subject these models to…

cs.CL2026

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

Piercosma Bisconti, Matteo Prandi, Federico Pierucci +11

Background. Traditional safety benchmarks for language models evaluate generated text: whether a model outputs toxic language, reproduces bias, or follows harmful instructions. Whe…

cs.CL2026

Metaphor Is Not All Attention Needs

Olga Sorokoletova, Francesco Giarrusso, Giacomo De Luca +6

Large language models are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, where their ability to resist harmful instructions is essential. Although post-training aims to mak…

cs.CL2026

Adversarial Humanities Benchmark: Results on Stylistic Robustness in Frontier Model Safety

Marcello Galisai, Susanna Cifani, Francesco Giarrusso +5

The Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) evaluates whether model safety refusals survive a shift away from familiar harmful prompt forms. Starting from harmful tasks drawn from M…

cs.GT2026

Institutional AI: Governing LLM Collusion in Multi-Agent Cournot Markets via Public Governance Graphs

Marcantonio Bracale Syrnikov, Federico Pierucci, Marcello Galisai +6

Multi-agent LLM ensembles can converge on coordinated, socially harmful equilibria. This paper advances an experimental framework for evaluating Institutional AI, our system-level…

cs.CY2026★ 2 cited

Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety

Federico Pierucci, Marcello Galisai, Marcantonio Syrnikov Bracale +6

As LLM-based systems increasingly operate as agents embedded within human social and technical systems, alignment can no longer be treated as a property of an isolated model, but m…

cs.CL2026

From Adversarial Poetry to Adversarial Tales: An Interpretability Research Agenda

Piercosma Bisconti, Marcello Galisai, Matteo Prandi +6

Safety mechanisms in LLMs remain vulnerable to attacks that reframe harmful requests through culturally coded structures. We introduce Adversarial Tales, a jailbreak technique that…

cs.CL2025

Adversarial Poetry as a Universal Single-Turn Jailbreak Mechanism in Large Language Models

Piercosma Bisconti, Matteo Prandi, Federico Pierucci +7

We present evidence that adversarial poetry functions as a universal single-turn jailbreak technique for Large Language Models (LLMs). Across 25 frontier proprietary and open-weigh…

cs.CL2025

Guarding the Guardrails: A Taxonomy-Driven Approach to Jailbreak Detection

Francesco Giarrusso, Olga E. Sorokoletova, Vincenzo Suriani +1

Jailbreaking techniques pose a significant threat to the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing defenses typically focus on single-turn attacks, lack coverage across lang…