collaborators
Showing cs.SEShow all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2026

Documentation Drift in AI-Generated Pull Requests

Will De Michele, Kla Tantithamthavorn

AI coding agents now contribute to software repositories at scale, yet their documentation practices remain uncharacterised. We analyse 29,669 AI-generated pull requests from 2,585…

cs.SE2026

XAgent: eXecution-guided Agentic AI for Effective Localization and Resolution of GitHub Issues

Hieu Huynh, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Michael Fu +2

Agentic AI has enabled capabilities in leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously resolve repository-level GitHub issues. However, due to the reliance on limited stati…

cs.SE2026

Requirements-Augmented Generation for Trustworthy Acceptance Testing of LLM-Based Software

Fanyu Wang, Chetan Arora, Zhenping Xie +4

LLM-based software (LBS) integrates large language models as core components to deliver flexible, personalised responses. Unlike traditional software with deterministic outputs, LB…

cs.SE2026

Towards a Risk Assessment of Malicious Skill Files in Coding Agents

Rui Yang, Michael Fu, Kla Tantithamthavorn +2

Autonomous coding agents are increasingly embedded in enterprise software workflows with delegated authority over connected systems. Central to this architecture is the agent skill…

cs.SE2026

AgenticRepair: Multi-Faceted Program Context Engineering for Agentic Vulnerability Repair

Michael Fu, Qiyue Mei, Patanamon Thongtanunam +1

Automated vulnerability repair aims to reduce the time and effort required to patch security flaws from a vulnerability triage report. Recent agentic AI approaches have shown promi…

cs.SE2026

Agentic Code Review in the Terminal: A Trajectory-Level Analysis of Behavior, Cost, and Human-Alignment

Wachiraphan Charoenwet, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam +3

Agentic code review in terminal-based environments enables early feedback during local development before pull request creation. However, existing evaluations remain performance-ce…

cs.SE2026

CodeChat-Eval: Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Code Refinement Dialogues

Guoxiang Guo, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Neelofar Neelofar +2

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software engineering to generate and refine code. In practice, developers often continue from an initial code generation reque…

cs.SE2026

RovoDev Code Reviewer: A Large-Scale Online Evaluation of LLM-based Code Review Automation at Atlassian

Kla Tantithamthavorn, Yaotian Zou, Andy Wong +8

Large Language Models (LLMs)-powered code review automation has the potential to transform code review workflows. Despite the advances of LLM-powered code review comment generation…

cs.SE2026

HalluJudge: A Reference-Free Hallucination Detection for Context Misalignment in Code Review Automation

Kla Tantithamthavorn, Hong Yi Lin, Patanamon Thongtanunam +3

Large Language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in code review automation, such as review comment generation, yet they suffer from hallucinations -- where the generated…