most citedTowards Reasoning Ability of Small Language Models

4 citations · 4 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

8 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Position, Role or Label? A Controlled Study of Instruction Conflicts in LLM Agents

Anish Laddha, Nitesh Pradhan, Gaurav Srivastava

LLM agents take instructions from the operator, repository configuration, user, tool results and saved memory, which often conflict. Instruction-hierarchy benchmarks ask whether th…

cs.CL2026

SLMJury: Can Small Language Models Judge as Well as Large Ones?

Anish Laddha, Nitesh Pradhan, Gaurav Srivastava

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as judges for evaluating model outputs, but their high cost, latency, and opacity limit scalability. We introduce SLMJury, a framework…

cs.CL2026

EffGen: Enabling Small Language Models as Capable Autonomous Agents

Gaurav Srivastava, Aafiya Hussain, Chi Wang +2

Most existing language model agentic systems today are built and optimized for large language models (e.g., GPT, Claude, Gemini) via API calls; while powerful, this approach faces…

cs.CL2025

Hindsight is 20/20: Building Agent Memory that Retains, Recalls, and Reflects

Chris Latimer, Nicoló Boschi, Andrew Neeser +4

Agent memory has been touted as a dimension of growth for LLM-based applications, enabling agents that can accumulate experience, adapt across sessions, and move beyond single-shot…

cs.CL2025

BeyondBench: Contamination-Resistant Evaluation of Reasoning in Language Models

Gaurav Srivastava, Aafiya Hussain, Zhenyu Bi +5

Evaluating language models fairly is increasingly difficult as static benchmarks risk contamination by training data, obscuring whether models truly reason or recall. We introduce…

cs.CL2025

Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models

Gaurav Srivastava, Aafiya Hussain, Sriram Srinivasan +1

Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on complex mathematical benchmarks yet sometimes fail on basic math reasoning while generating unnecessarily verbose res…

cs.CL2025

DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE: Self Evolution of Language Model Reasoning

Gaurav Srivastava, Zhenyu Bi, Meng Lu +1

Large language models (LLMs) have improved significantly in their reasoning through extensive training on massive datasets. However, relying solely on additional data for improveme…

cs.CL2025★ 4 cited

Towards Reasoning Ability of Small Language Models

Gaurav Srivastava, Shuxiang Cao, Xuan Wang

Reasoning has long been viewed as an emergent property of large language models (LLMs). However, recent studies challenge this assumption, showing that small language models (SLMs)…