2 citations · 4 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers · 1 filter
Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies
Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Andrew Schwartz +21
Forecasts of explosive AI progress hinge on AI agents automating AI research. But evidence on whether agents can carry out open-ended AI research is thin. Current evaluations eithe…
Automated Transcript Analysis for Detecting Flaws in Agentic Benchmarks
Jeff Mohl, Nelson Gardner-Challis, Magda Dubois +6
Capabilities of frontier models are often assessed using agentic benchmarks. To trust these results, benchmarks must accurately measure what they claim to and be free from invalida…
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis, Andrew Schwartz +15
Benchmark-based evaluation remains important for tracking frontier AI progress. But it can both overstate and understate deployed capability because it privileges tasks that can be…
Log analysis is necessary for credible evaluation of AI agents
Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Stephan Rabanser +8
Agent benchmarks typically report only final outcomes: pass or fail. This threatens evaluation credibility in three ways. First, scores may be inflated or deflated by shortcuts and…
Seven simple steps for log analysis in AI systems
Magda Dubois, Ekin Zorer, Maia Hamin +17
AI systems produce large volumes of logs as they interact with tools and users. Analysing these logs can help understand model capabilities, propensities, and behaviours, or assess…
Improving Methodologies for Agentic Evaluations Across Domains: Leakage of Sensitive Information, Fraud and Cybersecurity Threats
Ee Wei Seah, Yongsen Zheng, Naga Nikshith +67
The rapid rise of autonomous AI systems and advancements in agent capabilities are introducing new risks due to reduced oversight of real-world interactions. Yet agent testing rema…