activity
20242026
most citedAssessment of Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users Interacting with Intelligent Personal Assistants

20 citations · 39 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.HC2026

Bigger than the EAR BOX: A Theory-Grounded Review of XR Accessibility Research for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Communities

Shuxu Huffman, Michaela Okosi, Jose Merino +4

Extended Reality (XR) technologies have received growing attention in accessibility research involving Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) communities. Yet less attention has been given…

cs.HC2026

Are Caption Metrics Broken? Latency, Deaf and Hard of Hearing User Ratings, and Bias across Technologies

Bernard Thompson, James Waller, Luz Fanny Calderon Torres +5

Live captions on TV often contain errors and timing issues, making it hard for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) viewers to follow dialog. It is essential that caption quality metrics…

cs.HC2026

Seeing the Voice, Preserving the Self: A Participatory Design Approach to Deaf-Centric Text-to-Speech

Shela Atemnkeng, Patrick Boudreault, Paige DeVries +2

We describe a participatory design approach toward developing Deaf-centric text-to-speech (TTS) technologies. While TTS is growing rapidly in the mainstream, it has received little…

cs.HC2026

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access to Intelligent Personal Assistants: Comparison of Voice-Based Options with an LLM-Powered Touch Interface

Paige S. DeVries, Michaela Okosi, Ming Li +6

We investigate intelligent personal assistants (IPAs) accessibility for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) people who can use their voice in everyday communication. The inability of IP…

cs.HC2025

Barriers to Employment: The Deaf Multimedia Authoring Tax

C. Vogler, A. Glasser, R. Kushalnagar +7

This paper describes the challenges that deaf and hard of hearing people face with creating accessible multimedia content, such as portfolios, instructional videos and video presen…

cs.CY2025

Accessibility Considerations in the Development of an AI Action Plan

Jennifer Mankoff, Janice Light, James Coughlan +4

We argue that there is a need for Accessibility to be represented in several important domains: - Capitalize on the new capabilities AI provides - Support for open source developme…

cs.HC2024★ 20 cited

Assessment of Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users Interacting with Intelligent Personal Assistants

Nina Tran, Paige DeVries, Matthew Seita +3

With the recent advancements in intelligent personal assistants (IPAs), their popularity is rapidly increasing when it comes to utilizing Automatic Speech Recognition within househ…

cs.HC2024★ 15 cited

How Users Experience Closed Captions on Live Television: Quality Metrics Remain a Challenge

Mariana Arroyo Chavez, Molly Feanny, Matthew Seita +6

This paper presents a mixed methods study on how deaf, hard of hearing and hearing viewers perceive live TV caption quality with captioned video stimuli designed to mirror TV capti…

cs.HC2024★ 4 cited

Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users with Interactive Personal Assistants in Simulated Kitchen Environments

Paige DeVries, Nina Tran, Keith Delk +6

In this study, we assess the usability of interactive personal assistants (IPAs), such as Amazon Alexa, in a simulated kitchen smart home environment, with deaf and hard of hearing…