most citedThe Compulsory Imaginary: AGI and Corporate Authority

1 citations · 2 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cs.AI2026

The Normalization of Deviance in AI Development

Emilio Barkett, Alexander Kimpton, Daniel Graham +1

Work on the risks of artificial intelligence has focused predominantly on capability risk: the danger that systems become too powerful, too autonomous, or too misaligned with human…

cs.AI2026

Whose Alignment? Comparing LLM Process Alignment Across Diverse Organizational Decision Contexts

Niklas Weller, Emilio Barkett

Steerable pluralism requires a model to faithfully represent one specified perspective. Organizations are a natural setting for this demand, since they deploy LLMs to make decision…

cs.AI2026

Representation Without Control: Testing the Realization Effect in Language Models

Ciarán Walsh, Emilio Barkett

Large language models are increasingly used as behavioral simulators, but it remains unclear when their outputs reflect human-like cognitive mechanisms rather than prompt-sensitive…

cs.HC2026★ 1 cited

The Compulsory Imaginary: AGI and Corporate Authority

Emilio Barkett

This paper argues that the two leading AGI firms -- OpenAI and Anthropic -- construct sociotechnical imaginaries through a structurally consistent rhetorical strategy, despite mean…

cs.HC2026

Status Hierarchies in Language Models

Emilio Barkett

From school playgrounds to corporate boardrooms, status hierarchies -- rank orderings based on respect and perceived competence -- are universal features of human social organizati…

cs.CL2025

Don't Change My View: Ideological Bias Auditing in Large Language Models

Paul Kröger, Emilio Barkett

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly embedded in products used by millions, their outputs may influence individual beliefs and, cumulatively, shape public opinion. I…

cs.AI2025

Getting out of the Big-Muddy: Escalation of Commitment in LLMs

Emilio Barkett, Olivia Long, Paul Kröger

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in autonomous decision-making roles across high-stakes domains. However, since models are trained on human-generated data, th…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Reasoning Isn't Enough: Examining Truth-Bias and Sycophancy in LLMs

Emilio Barkett, Olivia Long, Madhavendra Thakur

Despite their widespread use in fact-checking, moderation, and high-stakes decision-making, large language models (LLMs) remain poorly understood as judges of truth. This study pre…