2 citations · 12 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for
10 papers · 1 filter
What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks
Meera Desai, Sang T. Truong, Hanna Wallach +8
Benchmarks play a central role in the development and governance of models, yet it is often unclear whether they actually measure the concepts they purport to measure (e.g., reason…
Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safety
Hannah Cha, Neha Shukla, Solon Barocas +3
Youth increasingly turn to AI chatbots for social and emotional support, raising concerns about how these systems respond, especially in high-stakes situations. However, existing c…
Effects of Generative AI Errors on User Reliance Across Task Difficulty
Jacy Reese Anthis, Hannah Cha, Solon Barocas +2
The capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) lie along a jagged frontier, where AI systems surprisingly fail on tasks that humans find easy and succeed on tasks that humans fin…
Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems
Emma Harvey, Emily Sheng, Su Lin Blodgett +4
The NLP research community has made publicly available numerous instruments for measuring representational harms caused by large language model (LLM)-based systems. These instrumen…
Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge
Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17
The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…
A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts
Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11
The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…
Gaps Between Research and Practice When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems
Emma Harvey, Emily Sheng, Su Lin Blodgett +4
To facilitate the measurement of representational harms caused by large language model (LLM)-based systems, the NLP research community has produced and made publicly available nume…
Dimensions of Generative AI Evaluation Design
P. Alex Dow, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon Barocas +3
There are few principles or guidelines to ensure evaluations of generative AI (GenAI) models and systems are effective. To help address this gap, we propose a set of general dimens…
Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge
Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17
Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…
Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders
Anna Kawakami, Daricia Wilkinson, Alexandra Chouldechova
The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts (e.g., Model Cards, Transparency Notes, Data Cards) to facilitate transparency and support the go…