activity
20232026
most citedVul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAG

17 citations · 49 across the 20 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

12 papers · 1 filter

cs.MA2025

BAMAS: Structuring Budget-Aware Multi-Agent Systems

Liming Yang, Junyu Luo, Xuanzhe Liu +2

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems have emerged as a powerful paradigm for enabling autonomous agents to solve complex tasks. As these systems scale in complexity…

cs.SE2025★ 1 cited

Towards Iterative End-to-End Software Development: A Feature-Driven Multi-Agent Framework

Junwei Liu, Chen Xu, Chong Wang +5

Recent advances in large language model agents offer the promise of automating end-to-end software development from natural language requirements. However, existing approaches larg…

cs.SE2025

Extracting Conceptual Knowledge to Locate Software Issues

Ying Wang, Wenjun Mao, Chong Wang +5

Issue localization, which identifies faulty code elements such as files or functions, is critical for effective bug fixing. While recent LLM-based and LLM-agent-based approaches im…

cs.SE2025★ 2 cited

Project-Level C-to-Rust Translation via Pointer Knowledge Graphs

Zhiqiang Yuan, Wenjun Mao, Zhuo Chen +4

Translating C code into safe Rust is an effective way to ensure memory safety. Compared to rule-based approaches, which often produce largely unsafe Rust code, LLM-based methods ge…

cs.LG2025

Software Fairness Dilemma: Is Bias Mitigation a Zero-Sum Game?

Zhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang +5

Fairness is a critical requirement for Machine Learning (ML) software, driving the development of numerous bias mitigation methods. Previous research has identified a leveling-down…

cs.SE2025★ 1 cited

Minimizing False Positives in Static Bug Detection via LLM-Enhanced Path Feasibility Analysis

Xueying Du, Kai Yu, Chong Wang +6

Static bug analyzers play a crucial role in ensuring software quality. However, existing analyzers for bug detection in large codebases often suffer from high false positive rates.…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

Can Agents Fix Agent Issues?

Alfin Wijaya Rahardja, Junwei Liu, Weitong Chen +2

LLM-based agent systems are emerging as a new software paradigm and have been widely adopted across diverse domains such as medicine, robotics, and programming. However, maintainin…

cs.AI2025

Taming System Complexity: Demystifying Software Engineering Agents in Diagnosing Linux Kernel Faults

Zhenhao Zhou, Zhuochen Huang, Yike He +5

The Linux kernel is a critical system, serving as the foundation for numerous systems. Bugs in the Linux kernel can cause serious consequences, affecting billions of users. Fault l…

cs.SE2025

Code Copycat Conundrum: Demystifying Repetition in LLM-based Code Generation

Mingwei Liu, Juntao Li, Ying Wang +9

Despite recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation, the quality of LLM-generated code still faces significant challenges. One significant issue is code rep…

cs.CL2025

Socrates or Smartypants: Testing Logic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models with Logic Programming-based Test Oracles

Zihao Xu, Junchen Ding, Yiling Lou +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress in language understanding and reasoning. Evaluating and analyzing their logical reasoning abilities has therefore be…

cs.CR2025★ 4 cited

Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories

Alperen Yildiz, Sin G. Teo, Yiling Lou +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in software vulnerability detection, particularly on function-level benchmarks like Devign and BigVul. However, real-world detection…

cs.SE2025

Show Me Why It's Correct: Saving 1/3 of Debugging Time in Program Repair with Interactive Runtime Comparison

Ruixin Wang, Zhongkai Zhao, Le Fang +4

Automated Program Repair (APR) holds the promise of alleviating the burden of debugging and fixing software bugs. Despite this, developers still need to manually inspect each patch…