activity
20232026
most citedLarge Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasets

9 citations · 18 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

cs.AI2026

CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents

Andrej Leban, Yuekai Sun, Theo Saarinen

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as data-science agents, combining abstract reasoning with advanced tool use. Yet the relevant benchmark landscape largely divides into…

cs.LG2026

From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning

Lingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen +9

Post-training pipelines that combine supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL) have emerged as the key recipe for transforming large language models (LLMs) into…

cs.AI2026

LeanMarathon: Toward Reliable AI Co-Mathematicians through Long-Horizon Lean Autoformalization

Yuanhe Zhang, Yuekai Sun, Taiji Suzuki +2

Long-horizon autoformalization of research mathematics fails not only at hard lemmas, but at scale: statements drift, dependencies tangle, context decays, and local repairs corrupt…

cs.CY2026

The Open Source Economic Index of AI Adoption and Capability

Seamus Somerstep, Aritra Guha, Divesh Srivastava +1

We work towards measuring both AI adoption and the capability of AI to perform discrete labor tasks across various occupations. To measure adoption, we develop an open-source econo…

cs.LG2026

K2-V2: A 360-Open, Reasoning-Enhanced LLM

K2 Team, Zhengzhong Liu, Liping Tang +36

We introduce K2-V2, a 360-open LLM built from scratch as a superior base for reasoning adaptation, in addition to functions such as conversation and knowledge retrieval from genera…

stat.AP2025

A Latent Variable Framework for Scaling Laws in Large Language Models

Peiyao Cai, Chengyu Cui, Felipe Maia Polo +6

We propose a statistical framework built on latent variable modeling for scaling laws of large language models (LLMs). Our work is motivated by the rapid emergence of numerous new…

stat.ML2025

Limitations of refinement methods for weak to strong generalization

Seamus Somerstep, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin +2

Standard techniques for aligning large language models (LLMs) utilize human-produced data, which could limit the capability of any aligned LLM to human level. Label refinement and…

stat.ML2025

Learning to Choose or Choosing to Learn: Best-of-N vs. Supervised Fine-Tuning for Bit String Generation

Seamus Somerstep, Vinod Raman, Unique Subedi +1

Using the bit string generation problem as a case study, we theoretically compare two standard methods for adapting large language models to new tasks. The first, referred to as su…

cs.LG2024

Sloth: scaling laws for LLM skills to predict multi-benchmark performance across families

Felipe Maia Polo, Seamus Somerstep, Leshem Choshen +2

Scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) predict model performance based on parameters like size and training data. However, differences in training configurations and data pr…

stat.ML2024

Microfoundation Inference for Strategic Prediction

Daniele Bracale, Subha Maity, Felipe Maia Polo +3

Often in prediction tasks, the predictive model itself can influence the distribution of the target variable, a phenomenon termed performative prediction. Generally, this influence…

cs.CV2024

LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content

Nimrod Shabtay, Felipe Maia Polo, Sivan Doveh +8

The large-scale training of multi-modal models on data scraped from the web has shown outstanding utility in infusing these models with the required world knowledge to perform effe…

stat.ML2024

Algorithmic Fairness in Performative Policy Learning: Escaping the Impossibility of Group Fairness

Seamus Somerstep, Ya'acov Ritov, Yuekai Sun

In many prediction problems, the predictive model affects the distribution of the prediction target. This phenomenon is known as performativity and is often caused by the behavior…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMs

Felipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber +6

Most popular benchmarks for comparing LLMs rely on a limited set of prompt templates, which may not fully capture the LLMs' abilities and can affect the reproducibility of results…

stat.ML2024

A transfer learning framework for weak-to-strong generalization

Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee +3

Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether these techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In p…

stat.ML2024

Learning the Distribution Map in Reverse Causal Performative Prediction

Daniele Bracale, Subha Maity, Moulinath Banerjee +1

In numerous predictive scenarios, the predictive model affects the sampling distribution; for example, job applicants often meticulously craft their resumes to navigate through a s…

cs.CL2024

Prompt Exploration with Prompt Regression

Michael Feffer, Ronald Xu, Yuekai Sun +1

In the advent of democratized usage of large language models (LLMs), there is a growing desire to systematize LLM prompt creation and selection processes beyond iterative trial-and…

stat.ML2024

Learning In Reverse Causal Strategic Environments With Ramifications on Two Sided Markets

Seamus Somerstep, Yuekai Sun, Ya'acov Ritov

Motivated by equilibrium models of labor markets, we develop a formulation of causal strategic classification in which strategic agents can directly manipulate their outcomes. As a…

cs.CL2024

Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment

Lilian Ngweta, Mayank Agarwal, Subha Maity +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications. Alignment is challenging, costly, and needs to be r…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples

Felipe Maia Polo, Lucas Weber, Leshem Choshen +3

The versatility of large language models (LLMs) led to the creation of diverse benchmarks that thoroughly test a variety of language models' abilities. These benchmarks consist of…

stat.ML2023

Weak Supervision Performance Evaluation via Partial Identification

Felipe Maia Polo, Subha Maity, Mikhail Yurochkin +2

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) enables supervised model training without direct access to ground truth labels, utilizing weak labels from heuristics, crowdsourcing, or pre-tra…

stat.ML2023

An Investigation of Representation and Allocation Harms in Contrastive Learning

Subha Maity, Mayank Agarwal, Mikhail Yurochkin +1

The effect of underrepresentation on the performance of minority groups is known to be a serious problem in supervised learning settings; however, it has been underexplored so far…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Fusing Models with Complementary Expertise

Hongyi Wang, Felipe Maia Polo, Yuekai Sun +3

Training AI models that generalize across tasks and domains has long been among the open problems driving AI research. The emergence of Foundation Models made it easier to obtain e…

cs.CL2023★ 9 cited

Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasets

Tal Shnitzer, Anthony Ou, Mírian Silva +5

There is a rapidly growing number of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) and benchmark datasets to compare them. While some models dominate these benchmarks, no single model t…

stat.ML2023

Conditional independence testing under misspecified inductive biases

Felipe Maia Polo, Yuekai Sun, Moulinath Banerjee

Conditional independence (CI) testing is a fundamental and challenging task in modern statistics and machine learning. Many modern methods for CI testing rely on powerful supervise…