activity
20242026
most citedOversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizations

9 citations · 18 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Memory-Aware Reward Modeling: Learning Human Preferences for LLM Memory Use

Yijiang River Dong, Zexue He, Cheng Yu +9

Memory enables language model assistants to maintain continuity across sessions and generate personalized responses, but knowing more about a user does not necessarily produce resp…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.CL2026

Bye Bye Perspective API: Lessons for Building and Governing Measurement Infrastructure

David Hartmann, Manuel Tonneau, Angelie Kraft +7

Perspective API closes at the end of 2026, removing the de facto standard for toxicity measurement and exposing researchers' dependence on a tool they did not control. Drawing on t…

cs.AI2026★ 2 cited

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni +34

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult…

cs.CY2026

Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirements

Jonathan Rystrøm, Chris Schmitz, Karolina Korgul +2

Deploying Large Language Model-based agents (LLM agents) in the public sector requires assuring that they meet the stringent legal, procedural, and structural requirements of publi…

cs.CL2026

One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization

Franziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner +1

Personalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfair outcomes across groups. Prior work has empl…