most citedOpen RL Benchmark: Comprehensive Tracked Experiments for Reinforcement Learning

3 citations · 3 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2026

Interaction-Limited Safe Continuous-Time RL for Dynamical Medical Treatment

Xun Shen, Yuepeng Wang, Akifumi Wachi +13

Dynamic medical treatment requires deciding treatment intensity and intervention timing, while patient states evolve continuously and adverse events may occur between clinical inte…

cs.LG2026

A Unified Benchmark for Dynamic Medical Treatment Reinforcement Learning

Yuepeng Wang, Ken Kawano, Yongqi Zhou +12

Medical treatment recommendation poses several challenges to reinforcement learning (RL): patient physiology evolves in continuous time, measurements and interventions are performe…

cs.LG2026

Demystifying Design Choices of Reinforcement Fine-tuning: A Batched Contextual Bandit Learning Perspective

Hong Xie, Xiao Hu, Tao Tan +5

The reinforcement fine-tuning area is undergoing an explosion papers largely on optimizing design choices. Though performance gains are often claimed, inconsistent conclusions also…

cs.LG2026

Rethinking Reinforcement fine-tuning of LLMs: A Multi-armed Bandit Learning Perspective

Xiao Hu, Hong Xie, Tao Tan +2

A large number of heuristics have been proposed to optimize the reinforcement fine-tuning of LLMs. However, inconsistent claims are made from time to time, making this area elusive…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Open RL Benchmark: Comprehensive Tracked Experiments for Reinforcement Learning

Shengyi Huang, Quentin Gallouédec, Florian Felten +30

In many Reinforcement Learning (RL) papers, learning curves are useful indicators to measure the effectiveness of RL algorithms. However, the complete raw data of the learning curv…