activity
20242026
most citedHow RLHF Amplifies Sycophancy

2 citations · 3 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

cs.AI2026

Algorithmic Impact Reveals the Hidden Social Choice Structure of Alignment

Zachary Wojtowicz, Michelle Si, Finale Doshi-Velez +1

When an AI algorithm makes decisions that affect more than one person, aligning it becomes a problem of social choice: how should people's divergent preferences about system behavi…

cs.AI2026★ 2 cited

How RLHF Amplifies Sycophancy

Itai Shapira, Gerdus Benade, Ariel D. Procaccia

Large language models often exhibit increased sycophantic behavior after preference-based post-training, showing a stronger tendency to affirm a user's stated or implied belief eve…

cs.AI2025

Question the Questions: Auditing Representation in Online Deliberative Processes

Soham De, Lodewijk Gelauff, Ashish Goel +3

A central feature of many deliberative processes, such as citizens' assemblies and deliberative polls, is the opportunity for participants to engage directly with experts. While pa…

cs.GT2025

Incentives in Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Agents

Ariel D. Procaccia, Han Shao, Itai Shapira

Federated learning promises significant sample-efficiency gains by pooling data across multiple agents, yet incentive misalignment is an obstacle: each update is costly to the cont…

cs.LG2025

Metritocracy: Representative Metrics for Lite Benchmarks

Ariel Procaccia, Benjamin Schiffer, Serena Wang +1

A common problem in LLM evaluation is how to choose a subset of metrics from a full suite of possible metrics. Subset selection is usually done for efficiency or interpretability r…

cs.LG2025

Alternates, Assemble! Selecting Optimal Alternates for Citizens' Assemblies

Angelos Assos, Carmel Baharav, Bailey Flanigan +1

Citizens' assemblies are an increasingly influential form of deliberative democracy, where randomly selected people discuss policy questions. The legitimacy of these assemblies hin…

cs.LG2025

Pairwise Calibrated Rewards for Pluralistic Alignment

Daniel Halpern, Evi Micha, Ariel D. Procaccia +1

Current alignment pipelines presume a single, universal notion of desirable behavior. However, human preferences often diverge across users, contexts, and cultures. As a result, di…

cs.GT2025

The Proportional Veto Principle for Approval Ballots

Daniel Halpern, Ariel D. Procaccia, Warut Suksompong

The proportional veto principle, which captures the idea that a candidate vetoed by a large group of voters should not be chosen, has been studied for ranked ballots in single-winn…

cs.GT2024

Strategic Classification With Externalities

Safwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Yiling Chen +1

We propose a new variant of the strategic classification problem: a principal reveals a classifier, and agents report their (possibly manipulated) features to be classified. Mo…

cs.GT2024

Federated Assemblies

Daniel Halpern, Ariel D. Procaccia, Ehud Shapiro +1

A citizens' assembly is a group of people who are randomly selected to represent a larger population in a deliberation. While this approach has successfully strengthened democracy,…

cs.GT2024

Learning Social Welfare Functions

Kanad Shrikar Pardeshi, Itai Shapira, Ariel D. Procaccia +1

Is it possible to understand or imitate a policy maker's rationale by looking at past decisions they made? We formalize this question as the problem of learning social welfare func…

cs.GT2024★ 1 cited

Bias Detection Via Signaling

Yiling Chen, Tao Lin, Ariel D. Procaccia +2

We introduce and study the problem of detecting whether an agent is updating their prior beliefs given new evidence in an optimal way that is Bayesian, or whether they are biased t…

cs.GT2024

Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedback

Luise Ge, Daniel Halpern, Evi Micha +4

In the context of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the reward function is generally derived from maximum likelihood estimation of a random utility model based on…