1 citations · 1 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
A Positive Case for Faithfulness: LLM Self-Explanations Help Predict Model Behavior
Harry Mayne, Justin Singh Kang, Dewi Gould +3
LLM self-explanations are often presented as a promising tool for AI oversight, yet their faithfulness to the model's true reasoning process is poorly understood. Existing faithful…
Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks
Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…
LLMs Don't Know Their Own Decision Boundaries: The Unreliability of Self-Generated Counterfactual Explanations
Harry Mayne, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Yushi Yang +4
To collaborate effectively with humans, language models must be able to explain their decisions in natural language. We study a specific type of self-explanation: self-generated co…
Can sparse autoencoders be used to decompose and interpret steering vectors?
Harry Mayne, Yushi Yang, Adam Mahdi
Steering vectors are a promising approach to control the behaviour of large language models. However, their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. While sparse autoencoder…
How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis
Yushi Yang, Filip Sondej, Harry Mayne +2
Safety fine-tuning algorithms reduce harmful outputs in language models, yet their mechanisms remain under-explored. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a popular choice of alg…