1 citations · 1 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for
11 papers · 1 filter
SKILLLITE: Evidence-Guided Malicious Skill Auditing with Compact LLMs
Haoran Ou, Gelei Deng, Xuanye Zhang +3
As LLM-based agents perform increasingly complex tasks, Agent Skills have emerged as a flexible mechanism for extending their capabilities. An Agent Skill packages task-specific in…
Auditing Chinese Web-scale Corpora via Sampled BPE Token Statistics
Qingjie Zhang, Ziqi Tang, Jie Zhang +7
Chinese web pollution has surfaced in LLMs, motivating audits of upstream Chinese corpora. However, auditing such corpora faces three challenges: (1) their web-scale size makes ful…
When Claws Remember but Do Not Tell: Stealthy Memory Injection in Persistent Personal Agents
Yechao Zhang, Shiqian Zhao, Jiawen Zhang +5
Persistent personal agents combine long-term memory with access to users' external environments, enabling personalized foreground assistance and proactive background execution. Thi…
Turning Bias into Bugs: Bandit-Guided Style Manipulation Attacks on LLM Judges
Xianglin Yang, Bryan Hooi, Gelei Deng +2
The known stylistic biases in LLM judges, such as a preference for verbosity or specific sentence structures, present an underexplored security vulnerability. In this work, we intr…
Mind Your HEARTBEAT! Claw Background Execution Inherently Enables Silent Memory Pollution
Yechao Zhang, Shiqian Zhao, Jie Zhang +5
We identify a critical security vulnerability in mainstream Claw personal AI agents: untrusted content encountered during heartbeat-driven background execution can silently pollute…
AutoEG: Exploiting Known Third-Party Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Web Applications
Ruozhao Yang, Mingfei Cheng, Gelei Deng +3
Large-scale web applications are widely deployed with complex third-party components, inheriting security risks arising from component vulnerabilities. Security assessment is there…
DECEIVE-AFC: Adversarial Claim Attacks against Search-Enabled LLM-based Fact-Checking Systems
Haoran Ou, Kangjie Chen, Gelei Deng +4
Fact-checking systems with search-enabled large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for verifying claims by dynamically retrieving external evidence. However, the ro…
"Are You Sure?": An Empirical Study of Human Perception Vulnerability in LLM-Driven Agentic Systems
Xinfeng Li, Shenyu Dai, Kelong Zheng +4
Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly becoming trusted copilots in high-stakes domains like software development and healthcare. However, this deepening trust introduces a…
Do LLMs and VLMs Share Neurons for Inference? Evidence and Mechanisms of Cross-Modal Transfer
Chenhang Cui, An Zhang, Yuxin Chen +5
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have rapidly advanced across various domains, yet they still lag behind strong text-only large language models (LLMs) on tasks that require mul…
Risky-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Safety Risks in Real-World Life-Assist Deployments
Jingnan Zheng, Yanzhen Luo, Jingjun Xu +8
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that operate in real-world environments, introducing safety risks beyond linguistic harm through tool use, external…
Self-Guard: Defending Large Reasoning Models via enhanced self-reflection
Jingnan Zheng, Jingjun Xu, Yanzhen Luo +6
The emergence of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) introduces a new paradigm of explicit reasoning, enabling remarkable advances yet posing unique risks such as reasoning manipulation…