1 citations · 1 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
11 papers
What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents
Xingshan Zeng, Zishan Xu, Boju Zhang +11
LLM agents increasingly rely on generated interaction data to learn how to interact with external environments. Agentic data generation must maintain consistency among environments…
ARTIS: Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation
Xingshan Zeng, Lingzhi Wang, Weiwen Liu +5
Current test-time scaling (TTS) techniques enhance large language model (LLM) performance by allocating additional computation at inference time, yet they remain insufficient for a…
ToolACE-MT: Non-Autoregressive Generation for Agentic Multi-Turn Interaction
Xingshan Zeng, Weiwen Liu, Lingzhi Wang +6
Agentic task-solving with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires multi-turn, multi-step interactions, often involving complex function calls and dynamic user-agent exchanges. Existi…
Stepwise Reasoning Checkpoint Analysis: A Test Time Scaling Method to Enhance LLMs' Reasoning
Zezhong Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Weiwen Liu +7
Mathematical reasoning through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has emerged as a powerful capability of Large Language Models (LLMs), which can be further enhanced through Test-Time Scaling…
Instruction-Tuning Data Synthesis from Scratch via Web Reconstruction
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu +8
The improvement of LLMs' instruction-following capabilities depends critically on the availability of high-quality instruction-response pairs. While existing automatic data synthet…
ToolACE-R: Model-aware Iterative Training and Adaptive Refinement for Tool Learning
Xingshan Zeng, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang +8
Tool learning, which allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to leverage external tools for solving complex user tasks, has emerged as a promising avenue for extending model capabiliti…
Learning to Align Multi-Faceted Evaluation: A Unified and Robust Framework
Kaishuai Xu, Tiezheng Yu, Wenjun Hou +6
Large Language Models (LLMs) are being used more and more extensively for automated evaluation in various scenarios. Previous studies have attempted to fine-tune open-source LLMs t…
Crowd Comparative Reasoning: Unlocking Comprehensive Evaluations for LLM-as-a-Judge
Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Yuxin Jiang +8
LLM-as-a-Judge, which generates chain-of-thought (CoT) judgments, has become a widely adopted auto-evaluation method. However, its reliability is compromised by the CoT reasoning's…
ToolFlow: Boosting LLM Tool-Calling Through Natural and Coherent Dialogue Synthesis
Zezhong Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Weiwen Liu +6
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a common method to enhance the tool calling capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), with the training data often being synthesized. The curren…
Subtle Errors in Reasoning: Preference Learning via Error-injected Self-editing
Kaishuai Xu, Tiezheng Yu, Wenjun Hou +7
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited strong mathematical reasoning prowess, tackling tasks ranging from basic arithmetic to advanced competition-level problems. However, fre…
RevisEval: Improving LLM-as-a-Judge via Response-Adapted References
Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Tiezheng YU +9
With significant efforts in recent studies, LLM-as-a-Judge has become a cost-effective alternative to human evaluation for assessing text generation quality in a wide range of task…