activity
20242026
most citedWhen AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

2 citations · 5 across the 30 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

32 papers

cs.AI2026

Asking for What Was Never Requested: Horizontal and Vertical Proactivity in Agents

Ido Levy, Asaf Yehudai, Segev Shlomov +2

An agent that uses tools typically responds to what the user explicitly asks, yet completing the task may require information the user never requested. Work on proactive agents mai…

cs.CL2026

Skill Issue: Are Skills Language-Invariant in LLMs?

Bobby Cheng, Adam Gaber, Zhengyuan Liu +4

Large language models access knowledge inconsistently across languages, but to what extent do they differ in their skill sets when interacting with different languages? This work q…

cs.CL2026

Automated Discovery Has No Universally Superior Harness

Akshat Gupta, Jermaine Lei, Alexander Lu +2

Autonomous discovery systems such as OpenEvolve and TTT-Discover are often used as general-purpose harnesses. However, in practice these are composite systems combining several des…

cs.LG2026

Stop Guessing When to Stop Testing: Efficient Model Evaluation with Just Enough Data

Ofir Arviv, Kristjan Greenewald, Yotam Perlitz +3

The inherent rigidity of fixed-size benchmarks makes them an inefficient tool for model evaluation. Diverse evaluation objectives, including model ranking, model selection and test…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.AI2026

MINDGAMES: A Live Arena for Evaluating Social and Strategic Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs

Kevin Wang, Anna Thöni, Benjamin Kempinski +50

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as interactive agents, yet their capacity for social and strategic reasoning over extended interaction remains poorly underst…

cs.CL2026

Instructions Shape Production of Language, not Processing

Andreas Waldis, Leshem Choshen, Yufang Hou +1

Instructions trigger a production-centered mechanism in language models. Through a cognitively inspired lens that separates language processing and production, we reveal this mecha…

cs.AI2026

CUBE: A Standard for Unifying Agent Benchmarks

Alexandre Lacoste, Nicolas Gontier, Oleh Shliazhko +23

The proliferation of agent benchmarks has created critical fragmentation that threatens research productivity. Each new benchmark requires substantial custom integration, creating…

cs.LG2026

Learning Not To Interfere: Adapting Experts For Model Merging

Pratik Ramesh, George Stoica, Arun Iyer +2

Model merging has shown that multitask models can be created by directly combining the parameters of different models that are each specialized on tasks of interest. However, model…

cs.AI2026

ErrorMap and ErrorAtlas: Charting the Failure Landscape of Large Language Models

Shir Ashury-Tahan, Yifan Mai, Elron Bandel +2

Large Language Models (LLM) benchmarks tell us when models fail, but not why they fail. A wrong answer on a reasoning dataset may stem from formatting issues, calculation errors, o…

cs.LG2026

Robustness as an Emergent Property of Task Performance

Shir Ashury-Tahan, Ariel Gera, Elron Bandel +2

Robustness is widely viewed as a key challenge for real-world applications. However, because current research focuses only on difficult tasks, it partially captures real-world read…

cs.CL2026

Do LLMs Benefit From Their Own Words?

Jenny Y. Huang, Leshem Choshen, Wei Sun +5

In multi-turn conversations, large language models typically condition on the full conversation history: both past user prompts and assistant responses. We revisit this design choi…

cs.AI2026★ 2 cited

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni +34

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult…

cs.CL2026

Will it Merge? On The Causes of Model Mergeability

Adir Rahamim, Asaf Yehudai, Boaz Carmeli +3

Model merging has emerged as a promising technique for combining multiple fine-tuned models into a single multitask model without retraining. However, the factors that determine wh…

cs.CL2026

CommonLID: Re-evaluating State-of-the-Art Language Identification Performance on Web Data

Pedro Ortiz Suarez, Laurie Burchell, Catherine Arnett +94

Language identification (LID) is a fundamental step in curating multilingual corpora. However, LID models still perform poorly for many languages, especially on the noisy and heter…

stat.AP2025

A Latent Variable Framework for Scaling Laws in Large Language Models

Peiyao Cai, Chengyu Cui, Felipe Maia Polo +6

We propose a statistical framework built on latent variable modeling for scaling laws of large language models (LLMs). Our work is motivated by the rapid emergence of numerous new…

cs.CL2025

CRISP: Complex Reasoning with Interpretable Step-based Plans

Matan Vetzler, Koren Lazar, Guy Uziel +3

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) underscore the need for stronger reasoning capabilities to solve complex problems effectively. While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reas…

cs.CL2025

LLM Hypnosis: Exploiting User Feedback for Unauthorized Knowledge Injection to All Users

Almog Hilel, Riddhi Bhagwat, Idan Shenfeld +2

We describe a vulnerability in language models (LMs) trained with user feedback, whereby a single user can persistently alter LM knowledge and behavior given only the ability to pr…

cs.CL2025

Can Gradient Descent Simulate Prompting?

Eric Zhang, Leshem Choshen, Jacob Andreas

There are two primary ways of incorporating new information into a language model (LM): changing its prompt or changing its parameters, e.g. via fine-tuning. Parameter updates incu…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Pretraining Language Models for Diachronic Linguistic Change Discovery

Elisabeth Fittschen, Sabrina Li, Tom Lippincott +2

Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential as tools for scientific discovery. This has engendered growing interest in their use in humanistic disciplines, such as historical…

cs.CL2025

NeurIPS 2023 LLM Efficiency Fine-tuning Competition

Mark Saroufim, Yotam Perlitz, Leshem Choshen +11

Our analysis of the NeurIPS 2023 large language model (LLM) fine-tuning competition revealed the following trend: top-performing models exhibit significant overfitting on benchmark…

cs.CL2025

DOVE: A Large-Scale Multi-Dimensional Predictions Dataset Towards Meaningful LLM Evaluation

Eliya Habba, Ofir Arviv, Itay Itzhak +5

Recent work found that LLMs are sensitive to a wide range of arbitrary prompt dimensions, including the type of delimiters, answer enumerators, instruction wording, and more. This…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

The Mighty ToRR: A Benchmark for Table Reasoning and Robustness

Shir Ashury-Tahan, Yifan Mai, Rajmohan C +8

Despite its real-world significance, model performance on tabular data remains underexplored, leaving uncertainty about which model to rely on and which prompt configuration to ado…