most citedWhere LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures

3 citations · 4 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

AgentDebugX: An Open-Source Toolkit for Failure Observability, Attribution, and Recovery in LLM Agents

Kunlun Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Zhiguang Han +9

LLM agent failures are difficult to debug because the step where an error surfaces is often not the one that caused it. Existing observability tools replay execution traces but pro…

cs.AI20251 cited

TaTToo: Tool-Grounded Thinking PRM for Test-Time Scaling in Tabular Reasoning

Jiaru Zou, Soumya Roy, Vinay Kumar Verma +6

Process Reward Models (PRMs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs), particularly in the context of…

cs.AI20253 cited

Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures

Kunlun Zhu, Zijia Liu, Bingxuan Li +15

Large Language Model (LLM) agents, which integrate planning, memory, reflection, and tool-use modules, have shown promise in solving complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their sophistica…

cs.AI2025

Solving Inequality Proofs with Large Language Models

Pan Lu, Jiayi Sheng, Luna Lyu +4

Inequality proving, crucial across diverse scientific and mathematical fields, tests advanced reasoning skills such as discovering tight bounds and strategic theorem application. T…

cs.AI2025

Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning

Tianyu Liu, Simeng Han, Hanchen Wang +27

Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear. We introduce ARIEL (AI Research A…