collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

14 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

The Illusion of : Evaluating the Breakdown of Counterfactual Reasoning in LLMs

Yucheng Wang, Yuetian Du, Zhengyi Liu +8

Counterfactual reasoning requires models to reason beyond the observed world and explain how altered conditions propagate through downstream consequences. Existing benchmarks large…

cs.AI2026

OmniJudge or OmniBias? Diagnosing Multimodal Judges through Balanced, Decoupled Lenses

Guangzheng Hu, Ziyue Jiang, Weixu Qiao +14

Multimodal understanding models that can jointly judge text-to-image (T2I), text-to-video (T2V) and text-to-speech (TTS) generation are increasingly used as "OmniJudges" for evalua…

cs.AI2026

Right Answer, Wrong Method: Shortcut Hacking Misleads the Evaluation of LLM Reasoning on Frontier Science Benchmarks

Xuan Ren, Weiqi Zhai, Tianle Pu +3

Scientific reasoning benchmarks typically evaluate large language models (LLMs) using final-answer accuracy. However, a correct answer does not necessarily demonstrate the reasonin…

cs.AI2026

FeynmanBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Diagrammatic Physics Reasoning

Zeyu Wang, Jingye Xu, Xiaogang Li +7

Current multimodal benchmarks for scientific reasoning primarily evaluate local information extraction -- models recognize symbols and values and then perform textual inference. Th…

cs.AI2026

BilliardPhys-Bench: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning and Visual Dynamics of Multimodal LLMs

Ben Wang, Xiaogang Li, Ruochen Gao +6

Current multimodal models handle static image recognition well, but intuitive physical reasoning remains a weakness. Predicting how objects will move and interact from a single ima…

cs.AI2026

Benchmark Health Index: A Systematic Framework for Benchmarking the Benchmarks of LLMs

Longyuan Zhu, Hairan Hua, Linlin Miao +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, yet the benchmarks used to measure this progress are becoming increasingly unreliable. Score inflation and selective reporting h…