activity
20232026
most citedVoting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debate

13 citations · 65 across the 39 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

13 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2024

Is my Meeting Summary Good? Estimating Quality with a Multi-LLM Evaluator

Frederic Kirstein, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp

The quality of meeting summaries generated by natural language generation (NLG) systems is hard to measure automatically. Established metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore have a rel…

cs.CL2024

The Promises and Pitfalls of LLM Annotations in Dataset Labeling: a Case Study on Media Bias Detection

Tomas Horych, Christoph Mandl, Terry Ruas +4

High annotation costs from hiring or crowdsourcing complicate the creation of large, high-quality datasets needed for training reliable text classifiers. Recent research suggests u…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Tell me what I need to know: Exploring LLM-based (Personalized) Abstractive Multi-Source Meeting Summarization

Frederic Kirstein, Terry Ruas, Robert Kratel +1

Meeting summarization is crucial in digital communication, but existing solutions struggle with salience identification to generate personalized, workable summaries, and context un…

cs.CL2024

What's Wrong? Refining Meeting Summaries with LLM Feedback

Frederic Kirstein, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp

Meeting summarization has become a critical task since digital encounters have become a common practice. Large language models (LLMs) show great potential in summarization, offerin…

cs.DL2024

CiteAssist: A System for Automated Preprint Citation and BibTeX Generation

Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Terry Ruas, Jan Philip Wahle +1

We present CiteAssist, a system to automate the generation of BibTeX entries for preprints, streamlining the process of bibliographic annotation. Our system extracts metadata, such…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Towards Human Understanding of Paraphrase Types in Large Language Models

Dominik Meier, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas +1

Paraphrases represent a human's intuitive ability to understand expressions presented in various different ways. Current paraphrase evaluations of language models primarily use bin…

cs.CL2024★ 6 cited

Paraphrase Types Elicit Prompt Engineering Capabilities

Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Yang Xu +1

Much of the success of modern language models depends on finding a suitable prompt to instruct the model. Until now, it has been largely unknown how variations in the linguistic ex…

cs.CL2024★ 10 cited

CADS: A Systematic Literature Review on the Challenges of Abstractive Dialogue Summarization

Frederic Kirstein, Jan Philip Wahle, Bela Gipp +1

Abstractive dialogue summarization is the task of distilling conversations into informative and concise summaries. Although reviews have been conducted on this topic, there is a la…

cs.CL2024

Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges

Jonas Becker, Jan Philip Wahle, Bela Gipp +1

Text generation has become more accessible than ever, and the growing interest in these systems, especially those using large language models, has spurred a surge in related public…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

What's under the hood: Investigating Automatic Metrics on Meeting Summarization

Frederic Kirstein, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas +1

Meeting summarization has become a critical task considering the increase in online interactions. While new techniques are introduced regularly, their evaluation uses metrics not d…

cs.CY2024

MAGPIE: Multi-Task Media-Bias Analysis Generalization for Pre-Trained Identification of Expressions

Tomáš Horych, Martin Wessel, Jan Philip Wahle +6

Media bias detection poses a complex, multifaceted problem traditionally tackled using single-task models and small in-domain datasets, consequently lacking generalizability. To ad…

cs.DL2024

Citation Amnesia: On The Recency Bias of NLP and Other Academic Fields

Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Mohamed Abdalla +2

This study examines the tendency to cite older work across 20 fields of study over 43 years (1980--2023). We put NLP's propensity to cite older work in the context of these 20 othe…

cs.CL2024★ 12 cited

The Media Bias Taxonomy: A Systematic Literature Review on the Forms and Automated Detection of Media Bias

Timo Spinde, Smi Hinterreiter, Fabian Haak +4

The way the media presents events can significantly affect public perception, which in turn can alter people's beliefs and views. Media bias describes a one-sided or polarizing per…