5 citations · 7 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Position: Don't Just "Fix it in Post": A Science of AI Must Study Training Dynamics
Stella Biderman, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Niloofar Mireshghallah +3
What would it mean to have a scientific understanding of AI? Models are not static objects: they are snapshots of time-evolving processes shaped by data, objectives, architectures,…
Quantifying the Effect of Test Set Contamination on Generative Evaluations
Rylan Schaeffer, Joshua Kazdan, Baber Abbasi +8
As frontier AI systems are pretrained on web-scale data, test set contamination has become a critical concern for accurately assessing their capabilities. While research has thorou…
Recite, Reconstruct, Recollect: Memorization in LMs as a Multifaceted Phenomenon
USVSN Sai Prashanth, Alvin Deng, Kyle O'Brien +9
Memorization in language models is typically treated as a homogenous phenomenon, neglecting the specifics of the memorized data. We instead model memorization as the effect of a se…
Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive?
Rylan Schaeffer, Hailey Schoelkopf, Brando Miranda +6
Predicting changes from scaling advanced AI systems is a desirable property for engineers, economists, governments and industry alike, and, while a well-established literature exis…
Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives
Elizabeth Seger, Noemi Dreksler, Richard Moulange +19
Recent decisions by leading AI labs to either open-source their models or to restrict access to their models has sparked debate about whether, and how, increasingly capable AI mode…