activity
20222026
most citedHolistic Evaluation of Language Models

128 citations · 173 across the 25 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

25 papers

cs.CL2026

DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbots

Jared Moore, Andrea Mock, Yifan Mai +9

Mental health professionals have raised concerns about risks of psychological harm from interaction with large language models (LLMs), including "delusional spirals" in which conce…

cs.AI2026★ 1 cited

Expert Evaluation of Clinical AI Tools on Real Point-of-Care Clinical Queries

Jean Feng, Vishal Patel, Patrick Heagerty +5

Physicians now pose millions of clinical questions to AI tools each week, yet these tools are evaluated largely on hypothetical or exam-style questions, not those actually asked in…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees

Siyu Zhou, Patrick Vossler, Venkatesh Sivaraman +2

A major bottleneck in characterizing the failure modes of generative AI systems is the cost and time of annotation and evaluation. Consequently, adaptive testing paradigms have gai…

cs.AI2026

Optimization before Evaluation: Evaluation with Unoptimised Prompts Can be Misleading

Nicholas Sadjoli, Tim Siefken, Atin Ghosh +2

Current Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation frameworks utilize the same static prompt template across all models under evaluation. This differs from the common industry practice…

cs.CL2026★ 5 cited

Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs

Jared Moore, Ashish Mehta, William Agnew +11

As large language models (LLMs) have proliferated, disturbing anecdotal reports of negative psychological effects, such as delusions, self-harm, and ``AI psychosis,'' have emerged…

cs.AI2026

Talk, Evaluate, Diagnose: User-aware Agent Evaluation with Automated Error Analysis

Penny Chong, Harshavardhan Abichandani, Jiyuan Shen +4

Agent applications are increasingly adopted to automate workflows across diverse tasks. However, due to the heterogeneous domains they operate in, it is challenging to create a sca…

cs.CL2026

OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets

Jiyuan Shen, Peiyue Yuan, Atin Ghosh +2

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) enhance the potential of natural language processing. However, their actual impact on document information extraction remains unclear. In p…

cs.CL2025

Structured Prompts Improve Evaluation of Language Models

Asad Aali, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Vasiliki Bikia +15

As language models (LMs) are increasingly adopted across domains, high-quality benchmarking frameworks are essential for guiding deployment decisions. In practice, however, framewo…

cs.AI2025

Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation

Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Peter Kirgis +28

AI agents have been developed for complex real-world tasks from coding to customer service. But AI agent evaluations suffer from many challenges that undermine our understanding of…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models

Tony Lee, Haoqin Tu, Chi Heem Wong +6

Evaluations of audio-language models (ALMs) -- multimodal models that take interleaved audio and text as input and output text -- are hindered by the lack of standardized benchmark…

cs.AI2025

The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities

Yoshua Bengio, Tegan Maharaj, Luke Ong +84

Rapidly improving AI capabilities and autonomy hold significant promise of transformation, but are also driving vigorous debate on how to ensure that AI is safe, i.e., trustworthy,…

cs.CL2025★ 10 cited

MedHELM: Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Medical Tasks

Suhana Bedi, Hejie Cui, Miguel Fuentes +78

While large language models (LLMs) achieve near-perfect scores on medical licensing exams, these evaluations inadequately reflect the complexity and diversity of real-world clinica…

cs.LG2025

LLMs Judging LLMs: A Simplex Perspective

Patrick Vossler, Fan Xia, Yifan Mai +2

Given the challenge of automatically evaluating free-form outputs from large language models (LLMs), an increasingly common solution is to use LLMs themselves as the judging mechan…

cs.CY2025★ 4 cited

AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons

Shaona Ghosh, Heather Frase, Adina Williams +99

The rapid advancement and deployment of AI systems have created an urgent need for standard safety-evaluation frameworks. This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehen…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

The Mighty ToRR: A Benchmark for Table Reasoning and Robustness

Shir Ashury-Tahan, Yifan Mai, Rajmohan C +8

Despite its real-world significance, model performance on tabular data remains underexplored, leaving uncertainty about which model to rely on and which prompt configuration to ado…

cs.CL2025

SEA-HELM: Southeast Asian Holistic Evaluation of Language Models

Yosephine Susanto, Adithya Venkatadri Hulagadri, Jann Railey Montalan +7

With the rapid emergence of novel capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs), the need for rigorous multilingual and multicultural benchmarks that are integrated has become more…

cs.CV2024

Image2Struct: Benchmarking Structure Extraction for Vision-Language Models

Josselin Somerville Roberts, Tony Lee, Chi Heem Wong +3

We introduce Image2Struct, a benchmark to evaluate vision-language models (VLMs) on extracting structure from images. Our benchmark 1) captures real-world use cases, 2) is fully au…

cs.CV2024

VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models

Tony Lee, Haoqin Tu, Chi Heem Wong +8

Current benchmarks for assessing vision-language models (VLMs) often focus on their perception or problem-solving capabilities and neglect other critical aspects such as fairness,…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Language model developers should report train-test overlap

Andy K Zhang, Kevin Klyman, Yifan Mai +4

Language models are extensively evaluated, but correctly interpreting evaluation results requires knowledge of train-test overlap which refers to the extent to which the language m…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies

Yi Zeng, Yu Yang, Andy Zhou +9

Foundation models (FMs) provide societal benefits but also amplify risks. Governments, companies, and researchers have proposed regulatory frameworks, acceptable use policies, and…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Construction

Xiang Lisa Li, Farzaan Kaiyom, Evan Zheran Liu +3

We present AutoBencher, a declarative framework for automatic benchmark construction, and use it to scalably discover novel insights and vulnerabilities of existing language models…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons

Bertie Vidgen, Adarsh Agrawal, Ahmed M. Ahmed +97

This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safe…

cs.CV2023★ 13 cited

Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Models

Tony Lee, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chenlin Meng +15

The stunning qualitative improvement of recent text-to-image models has led to their widespread attention and adoption. However, we lack a comprehensive quantitative understanding…