activity
20202026
most citedSelf-Compatibility: Evaluating Causal Discovery without Ground Truth

1 citations · 2 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.MLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

stat.ML2026

Falsifying Causal Graphs With Outlier Events

William Roy Orchard, Philipp M. Faller, Dominik Janzing

True causal relationships are rarely known, and inferring causal graphs from data is hard. A fundamental challenge is how to assess whether a given causal graph is good in the abse…

stat.ML2024

Cross-validating causal discovery via Leave-One-Variable-Out

Daniela Schkoda, Philipp Faller, Patrick Blöbaum +1

We propose a new approach to falsify causal discovery algorithms without ground truth, which is based on testing the causal model on a variable pair excluded during learning the ca…

stat.ML2024

Score matching through the roof: linear, nonlinear, and latent variables causal discovery

Francesco Montagna, Philipp M. Faller, Patrick Bloebaum +2

Causal discovery from observational data holds great promise, but existing methods rely on strong assumptions about the underlying causal structure, often requiring full observabil…

stat.ML2023

Reinterpreting causal discovery as the task of predicting unobserved joint statistics

Dominik Janzing, Philipp M. Faller, Leena Chennuru Vankadara

If denote sets of random variables, two different data sources may contain samples from and , respectively. We argue that causal discovery can help infer…

stat.ML2021

Causal Forecasting:Generalization Bounds for Autoregressive Models

Leena Chennuru Vankadara, Philipp Michael Faller, Michaela Hardt +3

Despite the increasing relevance of forecasting methods, causal implications of these algorithms remain largely unexplored. This is concerning considering that, even under simplify…