most citedQuantifying Fairness in LLMs Beyond Tokens: A Semantic and Statistical Perspective

1 citations · 2 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.AI2026

EvoBelief: Falsifiable World Models for Self-Improving LLM Agents

Janet Wang, Jiang Guo, Yi Xiang +6

Self-evolving LLM agents typically improve how they act through accumulated experience, reflection, or skills. Yet even procedurally capable agents can fail when their beliefs abou…

cs.AI2026

VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses

Zekai Wang, Yingqiang Ge, Zekun Wang +6

Harness evolution improves an LLM agent's prompts, tools, and workflow, while the optimizer's own tools and procedures often remain fixed. We study whether an optimizer can improve…

cs.SE2026

Safety Must Survive Self-Improvement: Why Failures Persist and How Agents Recover

Yunbei Zhang, Janet Wang, Saiyue Lyu +5

Recursive self-improvement (RSI) allows agents to carry useful changes across generations. Maintaining safety across these generations involves both preventing unsafe behavior from…

cs.MA2026

Deny Without Disabling: Authorization-Paired Evaluation and Control for Multi-Agent Systems

Yunbei Zhang, Saiyue Lyu, Janet Wang +4

Multi-agent systems derive their capabilities from sharing evidence, delegating tasks, and combining information across agents. The same process creates a safety problem: contribut…

cs.CV2026

When Can Text Replace Vision? Structural Bottlenecks in Diagram Reasoning

Yunbei Zhang, Janet Wang, Jihun Hamm +1

Can structured text replace vision for diagram reasoning? A wrong answer after textualization can arise because the representation omits information the question needs, or because…

cs.AI2026

DRIFTLENS: Measuring Memory-Induced Reasoning Drift in Personalized Language Models

Xi Fang, Weijie Xu, Yingqiang Ge +3

Personalization changes what a model says to a user; we show that it can also change the reasoning trajectory used to justify the response. Modern LLMs personalize interactions by…

eess.AS2026

DNSMOS-C: Improving End-to-end Speech Quality Models via Contrastive Learning

Xinyu Liang, Fredrik Cumlin, Victor Ungureanu +3

We introduce DNSMOS-C, a compact end-to-end speech quality assessment model that extends the DNSMOS Pro framework by integrating a MOS-guided triplet-based contrastive loss. Applie…

cs.LG2026

LLM-ACES: Closed-Loop Discovery of Dynamical Systems with LLM-Guided Adaptive Search

Nikhil Abhyankar, Sha Li, Sanchit Kabra +3

Recovering governing Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) from data is a central challenge in modeling dynamical systems across scientific domains. Existing approaches cast disco…

cs.CY2026★ 1 cited

Toward Individual Fairness Without Centralized Data: Selective Counterfactual Consistency for Vertical Federated Learning

Dawood Wasif, Chandan K. Reddy, Terrence J. Moore +1

When algorithmic decisions depend on data distributed across institutions, how can we ensure that an individual's outcome does not change arbitrarily based on a protected attribute…

cs.AI2026

Stop Comparing LLM Agents Without Disclosing the Harness

Yunbei Zhang, Janet Wang, Yingqiang Ge +3

This position paper argues that, for long-horizon tasks evaluated across models with comparable frontier capability, the agent execution harness, namely the infrastructure layer th…

cs.CR2026

Visual Exclusivity Attacks: Automatic Multimodal Red Teaming via Agentic Planning

Yunbei Zhang, Yingqiang Ge, Weijie Xu +3

Current multimodal red teaming treats images as wrappers for malicious payloads via typography or adversarial noise. These attacks are structurally brittle, as standard defenses ne…

cs.AI2025

Distractor Injection Attacks on Large Reasoning Models: Characterization and Defense

Zhehao Zhang, Weijie Xu, Shixian Cui +1

Recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) have enabled remarkable performance on complex tasks such as mathematics and coding by generating long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trace…

cs.AI2025

The Personalization Trap: How User Memory Alters Emotional Reasoning in LLMs

Xi Fang, Weijie Xu, Yuchong Zhang +3

When an AI assistant remembers that Sarah is a single mother working two jobs, does it interpret her stress differently than if she were a wealthy executive? As personalized AI sys…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Quantifying Fairness in LLMs Beyond Tokens: A Semantic and Statistical Perspective

Weijie Xu, Yiwen Wang, Chi Xue +4

Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate responses with inherent biases, undermining their reliability in real-world applications. Existing evaluation methods often overlook bia…

cs.RO2025

DriveMind: A Dual Visual Language Model-based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous Driving

Dawood Wasif, Terrence J. Moore, Chandan K. Reddy +5

End-to-end autonomous driving systems map sensor data directly to control commands, but remain opaque, lack interpretability, and offer no formal safety guarantees. While recent vi…

cs.CL2025

SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questions

Weijie Xu, Shixian Cui, Xi Fang +3

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated on single-answer multiple-choice tasks, yet many real-world problems require identifying all correct answers from a set of o…

cs.CL2025

FalseReject: A Resource for Improving Contextual Safety and Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs via Structured Reasoning

Zhehao Zhang, Weijie Xu, Fanyou Wu +1

Safety alignment approaches in large language models (LLMs) often lead to the over-refusal of benign queries, significantly diminishing their utility in sensitive scenarios. To add…