2 citations · 4 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers · 1 filter
When Wording Steers the Evaluation: Framing Bias in LLM judges
Yerin Hwang, Dongryeol Lee, Taegwan Kang +2
Large language models (LLMs) are known to produce varying responses depending on prompt phrasing, indicating that subtle guidance in phrasing can steer their answers. However, the…
Judging Against the Reference: Uncovering Knowledge-Driven Failures in LLM-Judges on QA Evaluation
Dongryeol Lee, Yerin Hwang, Taegwan Kang +3
While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automatic judges for question answering (QA) and other reference-conditioned evaluation tasks, little is known about the…
Can You Trick the Grader? Adversarial Persuasion of LLM Judges
Yerin Hwang, Dongryeol Lee, Taegwan Kang +2
As large language models take on growing roles as automated evaluators in practical settings, a critical question arises: Can individuals persuade an LLM judge to assign unfairly h…
Don't Judge Code by Its Cover: Exploring Biases in LLM Judges for Code Evaluation
Jiwon Moon, Yerin Hwang, Dongryeol Lee +3
With the growing use of large language models(LLMs) as evaluators, their application has expanded to code evaluation tasks, where they assess the correctness of generated code with…
Fooling the LVLM Judges: Visual Biases in LVLM-Based Evaluation
Yerin Hwang, Dongryeol Lee, Kyungmin Min +3
Recently, large vision-language models (LVLMs) have emerged as the preferred tools for judging text-image alignment, yet their robustness along the visual modality remains underexp…
Are LLM-Judges Robust to Expressions of Uncertainty? Investigating the effect of Epistemic Markers on LLM-based Evaluation
Dongryeol Lee, Yerin Hwang, Yongil Kim +2
In line with the principle of honesty, there has been a growing effort to train large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs containing epistemic markers. However, evaluation i…
Return of EM: Entity-driven Answer Set Expansion for QA Evaluation
Dongryeol Lee, Minwoo Lee, Kyungmin Min +2
Recently, directly using large language models (LLMs) has been shown to be the most reliable method to evaluate QA models. However, it suffers from limited interpretability, high c…
Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA
Dongryeol Lee, Segwang Kim, Minwoo Lee +4
Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering, because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging. Previously, Min et al. (2020) have…