most citedWhen Can We Trust LLMs in Mental Health? Large-Scale Benchmarks for Reliable LLM Evaluation

1 citations · 2 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

When Can We Trust LLMs in Mental Health? Large-Scale Benchmarks for Reliable LLM Evaluation

Abeer Badawi, Elahe Rahimi, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar +6

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) for mental health support is challenging due to the emotionally and cognitively complex nature of therapeutic dialogue. Existing benchmarks…

cs.CL2025

Deploying Tiny LVLM Judges for Real-World Evaluation of Chart Models: Lessons Learned and Best Practices

Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Ridwan Mahbub +7

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) with only 7B parameters have shown promise as automated judges in chart comprehension tasks. However, tiny models (<=2B parameters) still perfo…

cs.CL2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cost-Efficient Large Language Models in Benchmark Biomedical Tasks

Israt Jahan, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Chun Peng +1

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of cost-efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) for diverse biomedical tasks spanning both text and image modalities. We evaluated a r…

cs.CL2025

Improving Automatic Evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Biomedical Relation Extraction via LLMs-as-the-Judge

Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Israt Jahan, Elham Dolatabadi +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in biomedical relation extraction, even in zero-shot scenarios. However, evaluating LLMs in this task remains…

cs.CL2025

Judging the Judges: Can Large Vision-Language Models Fairly Evaluate Chart Comprehension and Reasoning?

Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Ridwan Mahbub +7

Charts are ubiquitous as they help people understand and reason with data. Recently, various downstream tasks, such as chart question answering, chart2text, and fact-checking, have…