activity
20232026
most citedShould We Fine-Tune or RAG? Evaluating Different Techniques to Adapt LLMs for Dialogue

4 citations · 13 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CV2025

Synthetic Stimuli, Real Gains: Rethinking VLM Fine-Tuning Through Fully Controlled Data Generation

Massimo Rizzoli, Simone Alghisi, Seyed Mahed Mousavi +1

Performance gains of Vision Language Models (VLMs) obtained by fine-tuning are generally based on ad hoc data collection and annotation of real-world scenes. Despite the improvemen…

cs.CV2025

[De|Re]constructing VLMs' Reasoning in Counting

Simone Alghisi, Gabriel Roccabruna, Massimo Rizzoli +2

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have recently gained attention due to their competitive performance on multiple downstream tasks, achieved by following user-input instructions. Howev…

cs.CL2025

Garbage In, Reasoning Out? Why Benchmark Scores are Unreliable and What to Do About It

Seyed Mahed Mousavi, Edoardo Cecchinato, Lucia Hornikova +1

We conduct a systematic audit of three widely used reasoning benchmarks, SocialIQa, FauxPas-EAI, and ToMi, and uncover pervasive flaws in both benchmark items and evaluation method…

cs.CV2025

CIVET: Systematic Evaluation of Understanding in VLMs

Massimo Rizzoli, Simone Alghisi, Olha Khomyn +3

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved competitive performance in various tasks, their comprehension of the underlying structure and semantics of a scene remains underst…

cs.CL2025

LLMs as Repositories of Factual Knowledge: Limitations and Solutions

Seyed Mahed Mousavi, Simone Alghisi, Giuseppe Riccardi

LLMs' sources of knowledge are data snapshots containing factual information about entities collected at different timestamps and from different media types (e.g. wikis, social med…