activity
20232026
most citedMapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers

43 citations · 62 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Matryoshka attribution: Learning to attribute language model outputs to representations and weights

Aryaman Arora, Kirill Acharya, Nathan Hu +4

Attributing language model outputs to their internal computations is an open problem in interpretability. Existing methods, which use causal interventions, gradients, or learnable…

cs.LG2026

Sycophantic Agreement Transfers with Neutral Data via Contrastive Preference Optimization

Camila Blank, Zhuofan Ying, Christopher Potts +2

Sycophantic agreement refers to a behavior in which language models excessively affirm the user, often at the cost of factual accuracy. Although sycophantic agreement is a well-kno…

cs.LG2026

PRISM Edit: One Vector for All Temporal Answers

Chen Huang, Qi Zheng, Ruiqin Zheng +2

Model editing keeps large language models (LLMs) up to date without retraining, but temporal facts expose a limitation of the prevailing locate-and-edit paradigm: an update is not…

cs.CL2026

Do Language Models Consistently Encode the Current Year?

Suze van Adrichem, Aditi Bhaskar, Diyi Yang +2

A consistent concept of the current time is important for temporal reasoning, yet how language models represent the current time is not well understood. We contribute two tasks tha…

cs.LG2026

Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retention

Jing Huang, Daniel Wurgaft, Rachit Bansal +6

Larger models learn tasks smaller models do not. What drives this phenomenon? We develop a simple phenomenological argument that power-law scaling already suggests that a larger mo…

cs.LG2026

PreFT: Prefill-only finetuning for efficient inference

Andrew Lanpouthakoun, Aryaman Arora, Zhengxuan Wu +4

Large language models can now be personalised efficiently at scale using parameter efficient finetuning methods (PEFTs), but serving user-specific PEFTs harms throughput, even with…

cs.CL2026

Outcome Rewards Do Not Guarantee Verifiable or Causally Important Reasoning

Qinan Yu, Alexa Tartaglini, Peter Hase +2

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) on chain-of-thought reasoning has become a standard part of language model post-training recipes. A common assumption is that…