26 citations · 96 across the 37 of their papers we have counts for
68 papers · 1 filter
Female participation in science in the past 125 years: An analysis of the Matilda effect over time
Felix Bittmann, Lutz Bornmann
The Matilda effect describes the systematic under-recognition of women's scientific contributions. We investigated its historical evolution by analyzing over 220 million publicatio…
Judges matter more than papers in post-publication research assessment
Robert Ward, Alex Jones, Lutz Bornmann
Research assessment relies on expert evaluations, yet human judgement is noisy, and it is unclear whether differences in assessment arise primarily from differences in genuine rese…
The Rising Dominance of Methods Across Science
Alexander Krauss, Ariel Rosenfeld, Lutz Bornmann
Scientific progress is traditionally narrated through the interplay of theoretical insights and experimental findings. Yet this view of science underplays a third and central pilla…
Citation accuracy, citation noise, and citation bias: A foundation of citation analysis
Lutz Bornmann, Christian Leibel
Citation analysis is widely used in research evaluation to assess the impact of scientific papers. These analyses rest on the assumption that citation decisions by authors are accu…
Introducing multiverse analysis to bibliometrics: The case of team size effects on disruptive research
Christian Leibel, Lutz Bornmann
Although bibliometrics has become an essential tool in the evaluation of research performance, bibliometric analyses are sensitive to a range of methodological choices. Subtle choi…
Dynamic disruption index across citation and cited references windows: Recommendations for thresholds in research evaluation
Hongkan Chen, Lutz Bornmann, Yi Bu
The temporal dimension of citation accumulation poses fundamental challenges for quantitative research evaluations, particularly in assessing disruptive and consolidating research…