activity
20072022
most citedA significance test for the lasso

565 citations · 3.2k across the 41 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

43 papers

stat.ME2022

Exact Selective Inference with Randomization

Snigdha Panigrahi, Kevin Fry, Jonathan Taylor

We introduce a pivot for exact selective inference with randomization. Not only does our pivot lead to exact inference in Gaussian regression models, but it is also available in cl…

stat.ME2022

Black-box Selective Inference via Bootstrapping

Sifan Liu, Jelena Markovic-Voronov, Jonathan Taylor

Conditional selective inference requires an exact characterization of the selection event, which is often unavailable except for a few examples like the lasso. This work addresses…

stat.ME2020★ 4 cited

Inferring Treatment Effects After Testing Instrument Strength in Linear Models

Nan Bi, Hyunseung Kang, Jonathan Taylor

A common practice in IV studies is to check for instrument strength, i.e. its association to the treatment, with an F-test from regression. If the F-statistic is above some thresho…

stat.ME2019★ 4 cited

Inference After Selecting Plausibly Valid Instruments with Application to Mendelian Randomization

Nan Bi, Hyunseung Kang, Jonathan Taylor

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular method in genetic epidemiology to estimate the effect of an exposure on an outcome by using genetic instruments. These instruments are oft…

stat.ME2019

Approximate selective inference via maximum likelihood

Snigdha Panigrahi, Jonathan Taylor

Several strategies have been developed recently to ensure valid inference after model selection; some of these are easy to compute, while others fare better in terms of inferential…

stat.ME2019★ 2 cited

Inference after black box selection

Jelena Markovic, Jonathan Taylor, Jeremy Taylor

We consider the problem of inference for parameters selected to report only after some algorithm, the canonical example being inference for model parameters after a model selection…