collaborators

6 papers

cs.LG2026

Diffuse AI Control on Fuzzy Tasks

Mikhail Terekhov, Caglar Gulcehre, Vivek Hebbar +1

AI models deployed in critical domains, such as AI safety research, may subtly sabotage our efforts due to misalignment. Diffuse AI Control is a subfield of AI safety concerned wit…

cs.LG2026

Faithfulness as Information Flow: Evaluating and Training Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Jinghan Jia, Joe Benton, Eric Easley

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is useful for monitoring language models only when the reasoning trace faithfully reflects the computation that produces the final answer. However,…

cs.CR2026

SLEIGHT-Bench: A Benchmark of Evasion Attacks Against Agent Monitors

Elle Najt, Colin Toft, Tyler Tracy +2

Since autonomous coding agents generate complex behaviors at high-volume, we may want to use other LLMs to monitor actions to reduce the risk from dangerous misaligned behavior. To…

cs.LG2026

Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervision

Emil Ryd, Henning Bartsch, Julian Stastny +2

As AI systems begin to automate complex tasks, supervision increasingly relies on weaker models or limited human oversight that cannot fully verify output quality. A model more cap…

cs.AI2025

Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agents

Jon Kutasov, Chloe Loughridge, Yuqi Sun +4

As AI systems become more capable and widely deployed as agents, ensuring their safe operation becomes critical. AI control offers one approach to mitigating the risk from untruste…

cs.AI2025

Optimizing AI Agent Attacks With Synthetic Data

Chloe Loughridge, Paul Colognese, Avery Griffin +3

As AI deployments become more complex and high-stakes, it becomes increasingly important to be able to estimate their risk. AI control is one framework for doing so. However, good…