activity
20162026
most citedNeural Proximal/Trust Region Policy Optimization Attains Globally Optimal Policy

61 citations · 252 across the 80 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

82 papers

cs.LG2026

Variance-Optimal State Resampling for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

Yibo Wang, Yuanxin Liu, Zhaoran Wang

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards spends much of its rollout budget on states that yield no learning signal. We recast this as a question about the sampling distributi…

cs.CL2026

Probe with Participation Trophies: Random-Reward RL as a Probe of LLM Capability

Yu Mao, Lei Yu, Zining Zhu +6

We connect the spurious-reward paradox to a model's reachability and propose random-reward reinforcement learning (RL) as a useful tool for the probing enterprise, addressing a dec…

cs.CL2026

Efficient and Trainable Language Model Test-Time Scaling via Local Branch Routing

Yutong Yin, Mingyu Jin, Jin Pan +12

Test-time scaling improves language-model reasoning, but existing approaches often face a difficult trade-off: long chain-of-thought sampling remains single-threaded, while sentenc…

cs.LG2026

Parallax: Parameterized Local Linear Attention for Language Modeling

Yifei Zuo, Dhruv Pai, Zhichen Zeng +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become the central paradigm in artificial intelligence, yet the core computational primitive of attention has remained structurally unchanged. Loc…

cs.CV2026

CreFlow: Corrective Reflow for Sparse-Reward Embodied Video Diffusion RL

Zhenyang Ni, Yijiang Li, Ruochen Jiao +7

Video generation models trained on heterogeneous data with likelihood-surrogate objectives can produce visually plausible rollouts that violate physical constraints in embodied man…

cs.CL2026

All Circuits Lead to Rome: Rethinking Functional Anisotropy in Circuit and Sheaf Discovery for LLMs

Xi Chen, Mingyu Jin, Jingcheng Niu +7

In this paper, we present empirical and theoretical evidence against a central but largely implicit assumption in circuit and sheaf discovery (CSD), which we term the Functional An…

cs.LG2026

HiPER: Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Credit Assignment for Large Language Model Agents

Jiangweizhi Peng, Yuanxin Liu, Ruida Zhou +4

Training LLMs as interactive agents for multi-turn decision-making remains challenging, particularly in long-horizon tasks with sparse and delayed rewards, where agents must execut…

cs.LG2025

Learning to Reason as Action Abstractions with Scalable Mid-Training RL

Shenao Zhang, Donghan Yu, Yihao Feng +4

Large language models excel with reinforcement learning (RL), but fully unlocking this potential requires a mid-training stage. An effective mid-training phase should identify a co…

cs.LG2025

Beyond Markovian: Reflective Exploration via Bayes-Adaptive RL for LLM Reasoning

Shenao Zhang, Yaqing Wang, Yinxiao Liu +5

Large Language Models (LLMs) trained via Reinforcement Learning (RL) have exhibited strong reasoning capabilities and emergent reflective behaviors, such as rethinking and error co…

cs.LG2025

BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning

Han Zhong, Yutong Yin, Shenao Zhang +10

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, yet generating reliable reasoning processes remains a significant challenge. We p…

cs.AI2025

Are Transformers Able to Reason by Connecting Separated Knowledge in Training Data?

Yutong Yin, Zhaoran Wang

Humans exhibit remarkable compositional reasoning by integrating knowledge from various sources. For example, if someone learns ( B = f(A) ) from one source and ( C = g(B) ) from a…

cs.AI2024

Hindsight Planner: A Closed-Loop Few-Shot Planner for Embodied Instruction Following

Yuxiao Yang, Shenao Zhang, Zhihan Liu +2

This work focuses on building a task planner for Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) using Large Language Models (LLMs). Previous works typically train a planner to imitate expert…

cs.SE2024

DSTC: Direct Preference Learning with Only Self-Generated Tests and Code to Improve Code LMs

Zhihan Liu, Shenao Zhang, Yongfei Liu +3

Direct preference learning offers a promising and computation-efficient beyond supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for improving code generation in coding large language models (LMs). How…

cs.LG2024

Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs

Shenao Zhang, Zhihan Liu, Boyi Liu +6

Preference alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly improved their ability to adhere to human instructions and intentions. However, existing direct alignment alg…

cs.RO2024

Safe MPC Alignment with Human Directional Feedback

Zhixian Xie, Wenlong Zhang, Yi Ren +3

In safety-critical robot planning or control, manually specifying safety constraints or learning them from demonstrations can be challenging. In this article, we propose a certifia…

cs.CL2024

Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games

Rui Zheng, Hongyi Guo, Zhihan Liu +10

The standard Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework primarily focuses on optimizing the performance of large language models using pre-collected prompts. Howev…

cs.LG2024

Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment

Shenao Zhang, Donghan Yu, Hiteshi Sharma +6

Preference optimization, particularly through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), has achieved significant success in aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) to adhere…

cs.LG2024

Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer

Zhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang +5

Aligning generative models with human preference via RLHF typically suffers from overoptimization, where an imperfectly learned reward model can misguide the generative model to ou…

cs.LG2024

A Mean-Field Analysis of Neural Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent for Functional Minimax Optimization

Yuchen Zhu, Yufeng Zhang, Zhaoran Wang +2

This paper studies minimax optimization problems defined over infinite-dimensional function classes of overparameterized two-layer neural networks. In particular, we consider the m…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Can Large Language Models Play Games? A Case Study of A Self-Play Approach

Hongyi Guo, Zhihan Liu, Yufeng Zhang +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) harness extensive data from the Internet, storing a broad spectrum of prior knowledge. While LLMs have proven beneficial as decision-making aids, their…

cs.LG2024

How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach

Shenao Zhang, Sirui Zheng, Shuqi Ke +6

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. However, RL algorit…

cs.LG2024

Double Duality: Variational Primal-Dual Policy Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement Learning

Zihao Li, Boyi Liu, Zhuoran Yang +2

We study the Constrained Convex Markov Decision Process (MDP), where the goal is to minimize a convex functional of the visitation measure, subject to a convex constraint. Designin…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Human-Instruction-Free LLM Self-Alignment with Limited Samples

Hongyi Guo, Yuanshun Yao, Wei Shen +4

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values is a vital task for LLM practitioners. Current alignment techniques have several limitations: (1) requiring a large amount o…

cs.AI2023★ 7 cited

Empowering Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models: A Safety Perspective

Yixuan Wang, Ruochen Jiao, Sinong Simon Zhan +5

Autonomous Driving (AD) encounters significant safety hurdles in long-tail unforeseen driving scenarios, largely stemming from the non-interpretability and poor generalization of t…