activity
20242026
most citedTowards Automated Detection of Inline Code Comment Smells

1 citations · 1 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.AI2026

Knowing the Store: What a Memory Backend Must Write Down Before an Agent Can Read It

Ansuman Mullick, Eray Tüzün

An agent with long-term memory can answer from a record it should no longer use, such as a plan the user later cancelled. We ask what a memory store must expose for an agent to kno…

cs.AI2026

Fortunate Recall: Ontology-Driven Memory Lifecycle Management for Persistent Coherence in LLMs

Ansuman Mullick, Eray Tüzün

Current LLM memory systems treat all personal facts identically, so stores grow without bound while retrieval precision degrades. The core challenge is lifecycle management: which…

cs.SE2026

Fine-Tuning Large Language Models to Classify Pull Request-Issue Alignments: Going Beyond Prompting

Mustafa Yasir Altunhan, Hüseyin Özgür Kamalı, Eray Tüzün

Context: Accurate alignment between pull requests (PRs) and corresponding issues is crucial for efficient software development and maintaining code quality, as misalignments can re…

cs.SE2026

Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review

Hüseyin Özgür Kamalı, Erdem Tuna, Vahid Haratian +1

Code review has evolved for decades, from informal peer checking to today's pull request (PR) workflows, yet it remains a largely manual and cognitively demanding process. The rise…

cs.SE2026

Automated Classification of Human Code Review Comments with Large Language Models

Semih Çağlar, Şükrü Eren Gökırmak, Eray Tüzün

Context: Code reviews are essential for maintaining software quality, yet many human review comments suffer from issues such as redundancy, vagueness, or lack of constructiveness.…

cs.SE2025

Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Review

Umut Cihan, Arda İçöz, Vahid Haratian +1

Context: Code reviews are crucial for software quality. Recent AI advances have allowed large language models (LLMs) to review and fix code; now, there are tools that perform these…

cs.SE2025

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions

Kutay Tire, Berk Çakar, Eray Tüzün

Pull Requests (PRs) are central to collaborative coding, summarizing code changes for reviewers. However, many PR descriptions are incomplete, uninformative, or have out-of-context…

cs.SE2025★ 1 cited

Towards Automated Detection of Inline Code Comment Smells

Ipek Oztas, U Boran Torun, Eray Tüzün

Code comments are important in software development because they directly influence software maintainability and overall quality. Bad practices of code comments lead to code commen…

cs.SE2024

Automated Code Review In Practice

Umut Cihan, Vahid Haratian, Arda İçöz +5

Code review is a widespread practice to improve software quality and transfer knowledge. It is often seen as time-consuming due to the need for manual effort and potential delays.…