activity
20242026
collaborators

6 papers

cs.CY2026

Lessons from External Review of DeepMind's Scheming Inability Safety Case

Stephen Barrett, Francisco Javier Campos Zabala, Sean P. Fillingham +4

Safety cases for frontier AI systems should provide a convincing argument, supported by evidence, that the risk of harm is within an acceptable bound. When developers author their…

cs.SE2026

Understanding: reframing automation and assurance

Robin Bloomfield

Safety and assurance cases risk becoming detached from the understanding needed for responsible engineering and governance decisions. More broadly, the production and evaluation of…

cs.SE2026

Quantifying Confidence in Assurance 2.0 Arguments

Robin Bloomfield, John Rushby

Confidence is central to safety and assurance cases: how much confidence a decision requires and how much the argument actually provides are both important questions. We present a…

cs.CY2025

Where AI Assurance Might Go Wrong: Initial lessons from engineering of critical systems

Robin Bloomfield, John Rushby

We draw on our experience working on system and software assurance and evaluation for systems important to society to summarise how safety engineering is performed in traditional c…

cs.LO2024

Automating Semantic Analysis of System Assurance Cases using Goal-directed ASP

Anitha Murugesan, Isaac Wong, Joaquín Arias +6

Assurance cases offer a structured way to present arguments and evidence for certification of systems where safety and security are critical. However, creating and evaluating these…

cs.SE2024

Confidence in Assurance 2.0 Cases

Robin Bloomfield, John Rushby

An assurance case should provide justifiable confidence in the truth of a claim about some critical property of a system or procedure, such as safety or security. We consider how c…