activity
20242026
most citedPoisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samples

6 citations · 17 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.LG2026

Distillation Defenses Easily Break After Reinforcement Learning

Shidan Javaheri, Alexander Panfilov, Oliver Britton +2

Distillation attacks copy the reasoning capabilities of closed-source large language models, allowing bad actors to replicate state-of-the-art performance at low cost. Attackers sy…

cs.CL2026

Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community

Lin Li, Qi Zhang, Xander Davies +2

AI is increasingly used to support scientific peer review, from manuscript screening, reviewer assistance to editorial triage. Although such systems promise to reduce reviewer burd…

cs.LG2026

Running the Gauntlet: Hard Agentic Tasks

Mykola Vysotskyi, Runqi Lin, Grzegorz Biziel +21

As agentic systems continue to evolve and are widely deployed in real-world scenarios, there is a growing demand to faithfully evaluate their capabilities. However, current benchma…

cs.CL2026

On Safety Risks in Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Agents

Weixiang Zhao, Yichen Zhang, Yingshuo Wang +8

Experience-driven self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the autonomy of large language model agents, yet its reliance on self-curated experience introduc…

cs.AI2026

OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage

Akshat Naik, Jay Culligan, Yarin Gal +4

As Large Language Model (LLM) agents become more capable, their coordinated use in the form of multi-agent systems is anticipated to emerge as a practical paradigm. Prior work has…

cs.LG2026

Boundary Point Jailbreaking of Black-Box LLMs

Xander Davies, Giorgi Giglemiani, Edmund Lau +3

Frontier LLMs are safeguarded against attempts to extract harmful information via adversarial prompts known as "jailbreaks". Recently, defenders have developed classifier-based sys…

cs.SE2025

RedCodeAgent: Automatic Red-teaming Agent against Diverse Code Agents

Chengquan Guo, Chulin Xie, Yu Yang +6

Code agents have gained widespread adoption due to their strong code generation capabilities and integration with code interpreters, enabling dynamic execution, debugging, and inte…

cs.CL2025

Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks

Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…

cs.CL2025

Evaluating & Reducing Deceptive Dialogue From Language Models with Multi-turn RL

Marwa Abdulhai, Ryan Cheng, Aryansh Shrivastava +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) interact with millions of people worldwide in applications such as customer support, education and healthcare. However, their ability to produce decept…

cs.LG2025★ 6 cited

Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samples

Alexandra Souly, Javier Rando, Ed Chapman +10

Poisoning attacks can compromise the safety of large language models (LLMs) by injecting malicious documents into their training data. Existing work has studied pretraining poisoni…

cs.CR2025

ToolTweak: An Attack on Tool Selection in LLM-based Agents

Jonathan Sneh, Ruomei Yan, Jialin Yu +6

As LLMs increasingly power agents that interact with external tools, tool use has become an essential mechanism for extending their capabilities. These agents typically select tool…

cs.AI2025★ 3 cited

A Definition of AGI

Dan Hendrycks, Dawn Song, Christian Szegedy +30

The lack of a concrete definition for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) obscures the gap between today's specialized AI and human-level cognition. This paper introduces a quant…

cs.AI2025

BiasBusters: Uncovering and Mitigating Tool Selection Bias in Large Language Models

Thierry Blankenstein, Jialin Yu, Zixuan Li +6

Agents backed by large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools drawn from marketplaces where multiple providers offer functionally equivalent options. This raise…

cs.LG2025

Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMs

Kyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony +7

Open-weight AI systems offer unique benefits, including enhanced transparency, open research, and decentralized access. However, they are vulnerable to tampering attacks which can…

cs.AI2025

Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition

Andy Zou, Maxwell Lin, Eliot Jones +14

Recent advances have enabled LLM-powered AI agents to autonomously execute complex tasks by combining language model reasoning with tools, memory, and web access. But can these sys…

cs.LG2025

Existing Large Language Model Unlearning Evaluations Are Inconclusive

Zhili Feng, Yixuan Even Xu, Alexander Robey +5

Machine unlearning aims to remove sensitive or undesired data from large language models. However, recent studies suggest that unlearning is often shallow, claiming that removed kn…

cs.CR2025

MIP against Agent: Malicious Image Patches Hijacking Multimodal OS Agents

Lukas Aichberger, Alasdair Paren, Guohao Li +3

Recent advances in operating system (OS) agents have enabled vision-language models (VLMs) to directly control a user's computer. Unlike conventional VLMs that passively output tex…

cs.LG2025

Fundamental Limitations in Pointwise Defences of LLM Finetuning APIs

Xander Davies, Eric Winsor, Alexandra Souly +4

LLM developers have imposed technical interventions to prevent fine-tuning misuse attacks, attacks where adversaries evade safeguards by fine-tuning the model using a public API. P…

cs.CR2025

Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilities

Zora Che, Stephen Casper, Robert Kirk +12

Evaluations of large language model (LLM) risks and capabilities are increasingly being incorporated into AI risk management and governance frameworks. Currently, most risk evaluat…

cs.LG2025

Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety

Fazl Barez, Tingchen Fu, Ameya Prabhu +16

As AI systems become more capable, widely deployed, and increasingly autonomous in critical areas such as cybersecurity, biological research, and healthcare, ensuring their safety…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions

Hazel Kim, Tom A. Lamb, Adel Bibi +2

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses, introducing significant risks for deployment in safety-critical domains. We present a novel, te…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI

Yuzhou Nie, Zhun Wang, Yu Yang +7

Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities (e.g., vulnerability detection) of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations:…

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents

Maksym Andriushchenko, Alexandra Souly, Mateusz Dziemian +11

The robustness of LLMs to jailbreak attacks, where users design prompts to circumvent safety measures and misuse model capabilities, has been studied primarily for LLMs acting as s…