6 papers
EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces
Léane Jourdan, Julien Aubert-Béduchaud, Yannis Chupin +2
Scientific writing is an iterative process that generates rich revision traces, yet publicly available resources typically expose only final or near-final versions of papers. This…
*-PLUIE: Personalisable metric with Llm Used for Improved Evaluation
Quentin Lemesle, Léane Jourdan, Daisy Munson +4
Evaluating the quality of automatically generated text often relies on LLM-as-a-judge (LLM-judge) methods. While effective, these approaches are computationally expensive and requi…
Identifying Reliable Evaluation Metrics for Scientific Text Revision
Léane Jourdan, Florian Boudin, Richard Dufour +1
Evaluating text revision in scientific writing remains a challenge, as traditional metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore primarily focus on similarity rather than capturing meaningfu…
ParaRev: Building a dataset for Scientific Paragraph Revision annotated with revision instruction
Léane Jourdan, Nicolas Hernandez, Richard Dufour +2
Revision is a crucial step in scientific writing, where authors refine their work to improve clarity, structure, and academic quality. Existing approaches to automated writing assi…
CASIMIR: A Corpus of Scientific Articles enhanced with Multiple Author-Integrated Revisions
Leane Jourdan, Florian Boudin, Nicolas Hernandez +1
Writing a scientific article is a challenging task as it is a highly codified and specific genre, consequently proficiency in written communication is essential for effectively con…
Text revision in Scientific Writing Assistance: An Overview
Léane Jourdan, Florian Boudin, Richard Dufour +1
Writing a scientific article is a challenging task as it is a highly codified genre. Good writing skills are essential to properly convey ideas and results of research work. Since…