20 citations · 25 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates
Axel Højmark, Jérémy Scheurer, Evgenia Nitishinskaya +5
Language models trained with reinforcement learning may learn to optimize the grader's judgment rather than the intended objective. This "reward-seeking" is difficult to measure be…
Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training
Bronson Schoen, Evgenia Nitishinskaya, Mikita Balesni +16
Highly capable AI systems could secretly pursue misaligned goals -- what we call "scheming". Because a scheming AI would deliberately try to hide its misaligned goals and actions,…
Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming
Alexander Meinke, Bronson Schoen, Jérémy Scheurer +3
Frontier models are increasingly trained and deployed as autonomous agent. One safety concern is that AI agents might covertly pursue misaligned goals, hiding their true capabiliti…
Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI scheming
Mikita Balesni, Marius Hobbhahn, David Lindner +13
We sketch how developers of frontier AI systems could construct a structured rationale -- a 'safety case' -- that an AI system is unlikely to cause catastrophic outcomes through sc…
Me, Myself, and AI: The Situational Awareness Dataset (SAD) for LLMs
Rudolf Laine, Bilal Chughtai, Jan Betley +6
AI assistants such as ChatGPT are trained to respond to users by saying, "I am a large language model". This raises questions. Do such models know that they are LLMs and reliably a…