4 papers · 1 filter
PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality
Sajad Ebrahimi, Soroush Sadeghian, Ali Ghorbanpour +6
The increasing scale and variability of peer review in scholarly venues has created an urgent need for systematic, interpretable, and extensible tools to assess review quality. We…
Peerispect: Claim Verification in Scientific Peer Reviews
Ali Ghorbanpour, Soroush Sadeghian, Alireza Daghighfarsoodeh +4
Peer review is central to scientific publishing, yet reviewers frequently include claims that are subjective, rhetorical, or misaligned with the submitted work. Assessing whether r…
PeerPrism: Peer Evaluation Expertise vs Review-writing AI
Soroush Sadeghian, Alireza Daqiq, Radin Cheraghi +3
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in scientific peer review, assisting with drafting, rewriting, expansion, and refinement. However, existing peer-review LLM detec…
Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models
Amirhossein Razavi, Mina Soltangheis, Negar Arabzadeh +3
Large language Models (LLMs) are highly sensitive to variations in prompt formulation, which can significantly impact their ability to generate accurate responses. In this paper, w…