activity
20212026
most citedEmotion Analysis in NLP: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directions

9 citations · 49 across the 32 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

14 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

Do Prompts Reshape Representations? An Empirical Study of Prompting Effects on Embeddings

Cesar Gonzalez-Gutierrez, Dirk Hovy

Prompting is a common approach for leveraging LMs in zero-shot settings. However, the underlying mechanisms that enable LMs to perform diverse tasks without task-specific supervisi…

cs.CL2025

Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotation

Joachim Baumann, Paul Röttger, Aleksandra Urman +4

Large language models are rapidly transforming social science research by enabling the automation of labor-intensive tasks like data annotation and text analysis. However, LLM outp…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

No for Some, Yes for Others: Persona Prompts and Other Sources of False Refusal in Language Models

Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, Paul Röttger, Nino Scherrer +3

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into our daily lives and personalized. However, LLM personalization might also increase unintended side effects. Recent wor…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Biased Tales: Cultural and Topic Bias in Generating Children's Stories

Donya Rooein, Vilém Zouhar, Debora Nozza +1

Stories play a pivotal role in human communication, shaping beliefs and morals, particularly in children. As parents increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to craft bedt…

cs.CL2025

Exploring Subjective Tasks in Farsi: A Survey Analysis and Evaluation of Language Models

Donya Rooein, Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, Debora Nozza +1

Given Farsi's speaker base of over 127 million people and the growing availability of digital text, including more than 1.3 million articles on Wikipedia, it is considered a middle…

cs.CL2025★ 3 cited

Principled Personas: Defining and Measuring the Intended Effects of Persona Prompting on Task Performance

Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo, Paul Röttger, Dirk Hovy +1

Expert persona prompting -- assigning roles such as expert in math to language models -- is widely used for task improvement. However, prior work shows mixed results on its effecti…

cs.CL2025

The Pluralistic Moral Gap: Understanding Judgment and Value Differences between Humans and Large Language Models

Giuseppe Russo, Debora Nozza, Paul Röttger +1

People increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) for moral advice, which may influence humans' decisions. Yet, little is known about how closely LLMs align with human moral…

cs.CL2025

Co-DETECT: Collaborative Discovery of Edge Cases in Text Classification

Chenfei Xiong, Jingwei Ni, Yu Fan +10

We introduce Co-DETECT (Collaborative Discovery of Edge cases in TExt ClassificaTion), a novel mixed-initiative annotation framework that integrates human expertise with automatic…

cs.ET2025

Educators' Perceptions of Large Language Models as Tutors: Comparing Human and AI Tutors in a Blind Text-only Setting

Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Donya Rooein +3

The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) opens up the possibility of using them as personal tutors. This has led to the development of several intelligent tutoring sys…

cs.CL2025

Can Reasoning Help Large Language Models Capture Human Annotator Disagreement?

Jingwei Ni, Yu Fan, Vilém Zouhar +6

Variation in human annotation (i.e., disagreements) is common in NLP, often reflecting important information like task subjectivity and sample ambiguity. Modeling this variation is…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions

Elisa Bassignana, Amanda Cercas Curry, Dirk Hovy

Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with each other and more recently, with digital technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs). While previo…

cs.CL2025

Beyond Demographics: Fine-tuning Large Language Models to Predict Individuals' Subjective Text Perceptions

Matthias Orlikowski, Jiaxin Pei, Paul Röttger +3

People naturally vary in their annotations for subjective questions and some of this variation is thought to be due to the person's sociodemographic characteristics. LLMs have also…

cs.CL2025

IssueBench: Millions of Realistic Prompts for Measuring Issue Bias in LLM Writing Assistance

Paul Röttger, Musashi Hinck, Valentin Hofmann +4

Large language models (LLMs) are helping millions of users write texts about diverse issues, and in doing so expose users to different ideas and perspectives. This creates concerns…

cs.CL2025

MSTS: A Multimodal Safety Test Suite for Vision-Language Models

Paul Röttger, Giuseppe Attanasio, Felix Friedrich +19

Vision-language models (VLMs), which process image and text inputs, are increasingly integrated into chat assistants and other consumer AI applications. Without proper safeguards,…