activity
20242026
most citedCatastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization

2 citations · 3 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

cs.AI2026

AgentPersonaBench: Benchmarking Persona-Driven User Simulation

Jintao Huang, Yifan Wang, Hongyu Shen +43

We introduce AgentPersonaBench (APB), a benchmark evaluating whether persona conditioning faithfully steers downstream agent behavior. While language models are increasingly deploy…

cs.AI2026

UniEvo-VL: An On-policy Self-Distillation Training Recipe for Multimodal Model Self-improvement

Fang Wu, Da Xing, Yanjie Huang +16

Modern multimodal models bring generation and understanding into a single unified system, which enables them to provide and learn from their own feedback. Motivated by this unified…

cs.CL2026

Targeting Pivotal Decisions for Credit Assignment in Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Dongwon Jung, Hemanth Neelgund Ramesh, Yifan Wang +7

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment of trajectory-level advantages t…

cs.AI2026

CONTRAMEM: Learning Self-Evolving Procedural Memory from Contrasting Multi-Model Trajectories

Zheyuan Deng, Binghang Lu, Hanqi Feng +11

Autonomous computer-use agents are increasingly applied to long-horizon tasks requiring coordinated application calls, persistent state tracking, and verifier-sensitive writes, yet…

cs.CL2026

MicroVerse: An Instrument for Measuring Self-Authored Identity Drift in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Language-Model Simulations

Sky Ng, Brihi Joshi, Ishan Gupta +47

Long-horizon, multi-agent language model (LM) simulations are widely proposed for studying social behavior, yet instruments to measure whether persona-conditioned agents maintain i…

cs.HC2026

PersonaEval: Persona-Based User Simulation for Evaluating Interactive Applications

Yifan Simon Liu, Qianfeng Wen, Yilan Fan +40

Real user studies are important for understanding how people interact with systems under test or already deployed. In practice, however, they are often costly, time-consuming, and…

cs.AI2026

MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona Agents

Xiaomin Li, Yuexing Hao, Jianheng Hou +90

Human evaluation of AI systems and digital products is costly, slow, and difficult to scale. Offline evaluations are more scalable but often abstract away human diversity and inter…

cs.AI2026

Automating SKILL.md Generation for Computer-Using Agents via Interaction Trajectory Mining

Yuexing Hao, Xiaomin Li

Explicit skill libraries make computer-using agents easier to inspect, but it remains unclear whether such libraries can be mined from interaction data in a way that improves downs…

cs.AI2026

UXBench: Measuring the Actionability of LLM-Generated UX Critiques

Wenjie Wang, Yue Huang, Zipeng Ling +11

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as UX judges that inspect interfaces, diagnose usability problems, and propose repairs. Yet no controlled benchmark measures…

cs.CL2026

Co-Evolving Skill Generation and Policy Optimization

Zhiwei Zhang, Yudi Lin, Nikki Lijing Kuang +4

Skill-augmented reinforcement learning improves language agents by storing reusable procedural knowledge acquired from past experience. Existing methods typically use strong langua…

cs.SE2026

ADK Arena: Evaluating Agent Development Kits via LLM-as-a-Developer

Jintao Huang, Xiaomin Li, Gaurav Mittal +1

The rapid proliferation of Agent Development Kits (ADKs), SDK-level frameworks for building LLM-powered autonomous agents, has outpaced any empirical understanding of how framework…

cs.SE2026

AgentLens: Revealing The Lucky Pass Problem in SWE-Agent Evaluation

Priyam Sahoo, Gaurav Mittal, Xiaomin Li +4

Evaluation of software engineering (SWE) agents is dominated by a binary signal: whether the final patch passes the tests. This outcome-only view treats a principled solution and a…

cs.LG2026

Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures

Weichen Yu, Xiaomin Li, Yizhou Zhao +8

Large language models are often post-trained with sparse verifier rewards, which indicate whether a sampled trajectory succeeds but provide limited guidance about where reasoning s…

cs.CV2026

When Think-with-Image Meets Safety: What Determines Multimodal Jailbreak Robustness?

Yuan Tian, Bing Hu, Fang Wu +3

Think-with-image reasoning is emerging as a new inference paradigm for large vision-language models, but its safety implications remain poorly understood. Existing systems already…

cs.LG2026

Muon-OGD: Muon-based Spectral Orthogonal Gradient Projection for LLM Continual Learning

Binghang Lu, Zheyuan Deng, Runyu Zhang +6

A central challenge in continual learning for large language models (LLMs) is catastrophic forgetting, where adapting to new tasks can substantially degrade performance on previous…

cs.AI2026

DataDignity: Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models

Xiaomin Li, Andrzej Banburski-Fahey, Jaron Lanier

Auditing language-model outputs often requires more than judging correctness: an auditor may need to identify which source document most likely supports the knowledge expressed in…

cs.AI2026

Chain of Risk: Safety Failures in Large Reasoning Models and Mitigation via Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering

Xiaomin Li, Jianheng Hou, Zheyuan Deng +6

Large reasoning models (LRMs) increasingly expose chain-of-thought-like reasoning for transparency, verification, and deliberate problem solving. This creates a safety blind spot:…

cs.AI2025

Multiplayer Nash Preference Optimization

Fang Wu, Xu Huang, Weihao Xuan +8

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the standard paradigm for aligning large language models with human preferences. However, reward-based methods grou…

cs.LG2025

Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementary

Zhiwei Zhang, Hui Liu, Xiaomin Li +10

Reward models trained on human preference data have demonstrated strong effectiveness in aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent under the framework of Reinforcemen…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

MedGUIDE: Benchmarking Clinical Decision-Making in Large Language Models

Xiaomin Li, Mingye Gao, Yuexing Hao +4

Clinical guidelines, typically structured as decision trees, are central to evidence-based medical practice and critical for ensuring safe and accurate diagnostic decision-making.…

cs.CL2025

ENCORE: Entropy-guided Reward Composition for Multi-head Safety Reward Models

Xiaomin Li, Xupeng Chen, Jingxuan Fan +2

The safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) often relies on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which requires human annotations to construct preference dat…

cs.CL2025

Data-adaptive Safety Rules for Training Reward Models

Xiaomin Li, Mingye Gao, Zhiwei Zhang +2

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is commonly employed to tailor models to human preferences, especially to improve the safety of outputs from large language models…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization

Zhiwei Zhang, Fali Wang, Xiaomin Li +6

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in generating text, benefiting from extensive training on vast textual corpora. However, LLMs may also acquire unwant…

cs.CL2024

Selection of LLM Fine-Tuning Data based on Orthogonal Rules

Xiaomin Li, Mingye Gao, Zhiwei Zhang +2

High-quality training data is critical to the performance of large language models (LLMs). Recent work has explored using LLMs to rate and select data based on a small set of human…