activity
20232026
most citedThe Foundation Model Transparency Index

44 citations · 116 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

19 papers

cs.CL2026

DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbots

Jared Moore, Andrea Mock, Yifan Mai +9

Mental health professionals have raised concerns about risks of psychological harm from interaction with large language models (LLMs), including "delusional spirals" in which conce…

cs.CY2026

FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AI

Shayne Longpre, Elaine Zhu, Carson Ezell +15

Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety. Yet the AI reporting ecosystem is fragmented: researchers who identify…

cs.CY2026

Economic Evaluations of Language Models

Alexander Wan, Stephane Hatgis-Kessell, Tomás Aguirre +2

Language models perform economically valuable work, yet they are not currently assessed for how well they perform every economically valuable task. We introduce EconEvals as an ope…

cs.CY2026

Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring

Rishi Bommasani, Sarah H. Bana, Kathleen A. Creel +2

Many employers screen job applicants with algorithms built by the same few algorithm vendors. We hypothesize that algorithmic monoculture leads to the same individuals and members…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Index

Alexander Wan, Kevin Klyman, Sayash Kapoor +5

Foundation model developers are among the world's most important companies. As these companies become increasingly consequential, how do their transparency practices evolve? The 20…

cs.AI2025

In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI

Shayne Longpre, Kevin Klyman, Ruth E. Appel +31

The widespread deployment of general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems introduces significant new risks. Yet the infrastructure, practices, and norms for reporting flaws in GPAI systems re…

cs.CY2025★ 15 cited

International AI Safety Report

Yoshua Bengio, Sören Mindermann, Daniel Privitera +93

The first International AI Safety Report comprehensively synthesizes the current evidence on the capabilities, risks, and safety of advanced AI systems. The report was mandated by…

cs.CY2024★ 7 cited

International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Interim Report)

Yoshua Bengio, Sören Mindermann, Daniel Privitera +41

This is the interim publication of the first International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI. The report synthesises the scientific understanding of general-purpose AI…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies

Yi Zeng, Yu Yang, Andy Zhou +9

Foundation models (FMs) provide societal benefits but also amplify risks. Governments, companies, and researchers have proposed regulatory frameworks, acceptable use policies, and…

cs.LG2024★ 8 cited

The 2024 Foundation Model Transparency Index

Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Sayash Kapoor +4

Foundation models are increasingly consequential yet extremely opaque. To characterize the status quo, the Foundation Model Transparency Index (FMTI) was launched in October 2023 t…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

AI Risk Categorization Decoded (AIR 2024): From Government Regulations to Corporate Policies

Yi Zeng, Kevin Klyman, Andy Zhou +6

We present a comprehensive AI risk taxonomy derived from eight government policies from the European Union, United States, and China and 16 company policies worldwide, making a sig…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

The Responsible Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: A Review of Tools & Resources

Shayne Longpre, Stella Biderman, Alon Albalak +20

Foundation model development attracts a rapidly expanding body of contributors, scientists, and applications. To help shape responsible development practices, we introduce the Foun…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons

Bertie Vidgen, Adarsh Agrawal, Ahmed M. Ahmed +97

This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safe…

cs.CL2024

LawInstruct: A Resource for Studying Language Model Adaptation to the Legal Domain

Joel Niklaus, Lucia Zheng, Arya D. McCarthy +7

Instruction tuning is an important step in making language models useful for direct user interaction. However, the legal domain is underrepresented in typical instruction datasets…

cs.AI2024★ 11 cited

A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming

Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Kevin Klyman +20

Independent evaluation and red teaming are critical for identifying the risks posed by generative AI systems. However, the terms of service and enforcement strategies used by promi…

cs.CY2024★ 11 cited

On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models

Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman +22

Foundation models are powerful technologies: how they are released publicly directly shapes their societal impact. In this position paper, we focus on open foundation models, defin…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Foundation Model Transparency Reports

Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre +5

Foundation models are critical digital technologies with sweeping societal impact that necessitates transparency. To codify how foundation model developers should provide transpare…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards

Norah Alzahrani, Hisham Abdullah Alyahya, Yazeed Alnumay +9

Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards based on benchmark rankings are regularly used to guide practitioners in model selection. Often, the published leaderboard rankings are take…

cs.LG2023★ 44 cited

The Foundation Model Transparency Index

Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre +5

Foundation models have rapidly permeated society, catalyzing a wave of generative AI applications spanning enterprise and consumer-facing contexts. While the societal impact of fou…